2009 Procurement Review: Statutes, Regulations, Executive Orders
Statutes
Individual Agencies
- Overview
- Agriculture
- Army
- Bureau of Industry and Security
- Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
- Department of Justice (DOJ)
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- General Services Administration (GSA)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior
- NASA
- Navy
- Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP)
- Small Business Administration (SBA)
- State
- Transportation
- Treasury
- USAID
- Veterans Affairs
Statutes
The American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, The Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009,
Public Law 111-8, is dated March 11. The Weapons Systems Acquisition Reform
Act of 2009, Public Law 111-23, is dated
May 22, 2009. The
NDAA for FY 2010 (Pub. L. 111 84) was enacted October 28,
2009. The
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010,
Public Law 111-118, was enacted December 19, 2009. Executive
Order 13494 makes unallowable the costs of
"any activities undertaken to persuade employees
'whether
employees of the recipient of the Federal
disbursements or of any other entity' to exercise or
not to exercise, or concerning the manner of
exercising, the right to organize and bargain
collectively through representatives of the employees'
own choosing." Executive
Order 13495 requires service contracts to include
a clause requiring a follow-on service contractor to
give the previous contractor's employees a right of
first refusal to continue work on the contract. Executive
Order 13496 requires government contractors and
subcontractors to post notices informing employees of
their collective bargaining rights. Failure to do so
can result in contract termination and debarment. Executive
Order 13502 authorizes federal agencies to require
project labor agreements (collective bargaining
agreements) on large scale construction projects
(those whose cost to the federal government equals or
exceeds $25 million) when certain criteria are met. Executive
Order 13222
Extension:
Export control regulations--in a notice issued August 13, President
Obama continued for one year Executive Order 13222,
which declared a national emergency with respect to
the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national
security, foreign policy, and economy of the United
States in light of the expiration of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App.
2401 et seq.). Executive
Order 13520 (Nov. 20, 2009), entitled
"Reducing Improper Payments," requires, inter
alia, agencies to publish lists of the entities
that have received the greatest amount of outstanding
improper payments under government contracts, grants,
etc. President Obama's Memorandum of March 4,
entitled "Government Contracting," suggests
we may be seeing fewer cost reimbursement contracts
and less reliance on limited competition (including
sole source) contracts and outsourcing. Consistent with section
202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C.
1622(d), the President issued a notice dated September
10, which continues for one year the national
emergency declared on September
14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the
continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on
the United States. Item I, a final rule entitled
"Federal Procurement Data System
("FPDS")" (FAR Case 2004-038), (i)
establishes the FPDS
as the single authoritative source of all procurement
data for a host of applications and reports, such as
the Central Contractor Registration (CCR), the
Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS), the
Small Business Goaling Report (SRGR), and Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) data; and (ii)
requires contracting officers to verify the accuracy
of contract award data prior to reporting the data in
FPDS. Item II, a final rule entitled
Commercially Off-the-Shelf ("COTS")
Items (FAR Case 2000-305), (i) amends the FAR to
implement Section 4203 of the Clinger-Cohen Act of
1996 (41 U.S.C. 431) with respect to the
inapplicability of certain laws to contracts and
subcontracts for the
acquisition of COTS items, (ii) establishes a new
FAR section 12.103, which outlines the treatment
of COTS items, and (iii) provides a new definition of
a COTS item and revised definitions of "domestic
end product" and "domestic construction
material." Item III, a final rule entitled
"Exemption of Certain Service Contracts from the
Service Contract Act ("SCA") FAR Case
2001-004, (i) revises the current SCA
exemption in the FAR and adds an SCA exemption for
contracts for certain additional services that meet
specific criteria and (ii) adds to the "Annual
Representations and Certifications" clause at FAR
52.204-8, the conditions under which each listed
provision applies or (for the more complex cases) a
check-off for the contracting officer to indicate
whether the provision is applicable to the
solicitation. Item IV, an interim rule
entitled "Public Disclosure of Justification and
Approval Documents for Noncompetitive
Contracts-Section 844 of the NDAA for FY 2008 (Interim)"
(FAR Case 2008-003), (i) implements Section 844 of the
NDAA for FY 2008; (ii) amends FAR 6.305 to require agencies
to make available for public inspection within 14 days
after contract award the
justification required by FAR 6.303-1, on the
website of the agency and at the FedBizOpps
website or (in the case of a contract award
permitted under FAR 6.302-2) a posted justification
within 30 days after contract award; and (iii)
requires contracting officers to screen all
justifications for contractor proprietary data and
remove all such data prior to publication. Item V, a final rule entitled
SAFETY Act: Implementation of DHS Regulations (FAR
Case 2006-023), implements the provisions of the
SAFETY Act, which provides incentives for the
development and deployment of anti-terrorism
technologies by creating a system of "risk
management" and a system of "litigation
management." Item VI, a final rule
entitled "Electronic Products Environmental
Assessment Tool ("EPEAT")" (FAR Case
2006-030), adopts the previous interim rule without
change so as to (i) require use of EPEAT when
acquiring personal
computer products such as desktops, laptops, and
monitors pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and
Executive Order 13423, (ii) revise FAR Subpart 23.7
and (iii) prescribe a clause at 52.223-16 (also
included in 52.212-5 for acquisition of commercial
items) in all solicitations and contracts for the
acquisition of personal computer products, services
that require furnishing of personal computer products
for use by the Government and services for contractor
operation of government-owned facilities. Item VII, a final rule
entitled "Combating Trafficking in Persons (FAR
Case 2005-012), (i) implements Section 3(b) of the
Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act
(TVPRA) of 2003, (ii) requires that contracts contain
a clause allowing the agency to terminate the contract
if a contractor, contractor employees, subcontractor,
or subcontractor employees engage in severe forms of trafficking
in persons or procures a commercial sex act during
the period of performance of the contract, or uses
forced labor in the performance of the contract, and
(iii) provides that the contracting officer may
consider whether the contractor had a Trafficking in
Persons awareness program at the time of a violation
as a mitigating factor when determining remedies; and
a website where the contractor may obtain additional
information about Trafficking in Persons and examples
of awareness programs. Item VIII, a final rule entitled
"Trade Agreements--New Thresholds" (FAR Case
2007-016) adopts the previous interim rule without
change and adjusts the
thresholds for application of the World Trade
Organization Government Procurement Agreement and the
Free Trade Agreements as determined by the United
States Trade Representative, according to a formula
set forth in the agreements. Item IX is an editorial change
to FAR
15.101-2. Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-31
has been published. It includes the following six
items: Item I, a final rule entitled
"Small Business Size Representation" (FAR
Case 2006-032), implements the Small Business
Administration's (SBA) final rule published on
November 15, 2006 (71 FR 66434), entitled "Small
Business Size Regulations; Size for Purposes of
Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts, Multiple Award
Schedule Contracts and Other Long-Term Contracts; 8(a)
Business Development/Small Disadvantaged Business;
Business Status Determinations." The new rule
adopts (with several changes) the interim rule
originally published at 72 FR 36852 (July 5, 2007) and
applies to solicitations issued and contracts awarded
on or after April 20, 2009. Moreover, all long-term
contracts as defined in the rule, awarded to small
business concerns prior to June 30, 2007, that have
not yet been modified to include FAR 52.219-28, must
be modified to include FAR 52.219-28 within 90 days
after the effective date of this final rule.
Basically, the new rule requires businesses to re-certify
their status as small at various points during
long-term contracts. Item II, an interim rule
entitled "Clarification of Submission of Cost or
Pricing Data on Non-Commercial Modifications of
Commercial Items" (FAR Case 2008-012), implements
Section 814 of the NDAA for FY 2008, which requires the
harmonization of the
threshold for cost or pricing data on
non-commercial modifications of commercial items with
the Truth In Negotiation Act (TINA) threshold for cost
and pricing data. The new threshold is $650,000, and
it will be adjusted as necessary to maintain the
required consistency in the future. Item III, a final rule entitled "Amendments
to Incorporate New Wage Determinations" (FAR
Case 2008-014), amends the FAR to preclude a
possible scenario where a contracting officer has to
unnecessarily reevaluate proposals already eliminated
from a competition. The new rule corrects the
inconsistency at FAR 22.404-5(c)(3) by changing the
language to indicate a contracting officer shall amend
solicitations to incorporate new wage determinations
and furnish the wage rate information to all offerors
that have not been eliminated from the competition, if
the closing date for receipt of offers has already
passed. Item IV, a final rule entitled "Least
Developed Countries that are Designated
Countries" (FAR Case 2008-021), amends FAR
25.003's lists of designated and least-developed
countries and the contract clauses at FAR 52.225-05
and 52.225-11. Item V, an interim rule entitled
"Federal Food Donation Act of 2008 (Pub. L.
110-247)" (FAR Case 2008-017), to implement the Federal
Food Donation Act of 2008, which encourages
executive agencies and their contractors, in contracts
for the provision, service, or sale of food, to the
maximum extent practicable and safe, to donate
apparently wholesome excess food to nonprofit
organizations that provide assistance to food-insecure
people in the United States. Item VI entitled "Technical
Amendments" makes miscellaneous editorial
changes to the FAR. Federal
Acquisition Circular 2005-32 has been
published. It contains six regulations, the first five
of which are issued under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the "Recovery
Act"): Item I, an
interim rule entitled "Buy
American Act Requirements for Construction
Materials" (FAR Case 2009-008) prohibits
the use of funds appropriated or otherwise made
available by the Recovery Act for any project for the
construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a
public building or public work unless all of the iron,
steel, and manufactured goods used in the project are
produced in the United States. Item III, an
interim rule entitled "Publicizing
Contract Actions" (FAR Case
2009-010) amends the FAR to reflect new
requirements for (i) posting of
presolicitation notices; (ii) announcing contract
awards; (iii) entering awards into the Federal
Procurement Data System (FPDS); and (iv) actions that
are not fixed-price or competitive. Item IV, an
interim rule entitled "Reporting
Requirements" (FAR Case 2009-009), which
implements the portion of the Recovery Act known as
the "Jobs Accountability Act,"
requires contractors that receive awards (or
modifications to existing awards) funded, in whole or
in part, by the Recovery Act to report quarterly on
the use of the funds. Item V, an
interim rule entitled "GAO/IG
Access" (FAR Case 2009-011) adds
alternate clauses to FAR 52.214-26, "Audit and Records Sealed Bidding," FAR 52.212 5,
"Contract Terms and Conditions Required to
Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial
Items," and FAR 52.215-2, "Audit and
Records-Negotiation." Moreover, FAR 12.504(a)(7)
is amended for contracts using Recovery Act funds to
apply 41 U.S.C. 254d(c) and 10 U.S.C. 2313(c),
Examination of Records of Contractor, to commercial
item subcontracts that are otherwise exempt when
subcontractors are not required to provide cost or
pricing data. Likewise, FAR 13.006(d) is amended for
contracts using Recovery Act funds to apply 52.215-2,
"Audit and Records-Negotiation" to contracts
and subcontracts which are otherwise exempt because
they are under the simplified acquisition threshold. Item VI, an
interim rule entitled "GAO
Access to Contractor Employees" (FAR Case
2008-011), implements Section 871 of the
Duncan Hunter NDAA for
FY 2009 (NDAA) (Pub. L. 110 417), which
allows the GAO to interview current contractor
employees during the audit of the contractor s
records. FAR 52.215 2(d)(1) "Audit and
Records-Negotiation," is revised to allow for the
required access by inserting before the period: "and
to interview any current employee regarding such
transactions." FAR 52.214 26(c) "Audit and
Records-Sealed Bidding" is revised to allow for
the required access by inserting before the period:
"and also the right to interview any current
employee regarding such transactions."
Federal
Acquisition Circular 2005-33 includes two items.
Item I (FAR
Case 2008-036) is an interim rule, which allows
contracting officers to purchase the goods and
services of Costa Rica, Oman, and Peru without
application of the Buy American Act if the acquisition
is subject to the applicable trade agreements. Item
II, entitled Contractor's
Request for Progress Payments (FAR Case 2005-032),
is a final rule that incorporates improvements related
to requests for progress payments and the Standard
Form 1443, Contractor s Request for Progress
Payments, used to request those progress payments. Federal
Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-34 includes three
items. Item I (FAR Case 2006-022), a
final rule entitled "Contractor Performance
Information" implements the President's March 4
Memorandum on Government Contracting by promoting the
use of a standard performance information reporting
system, the Past
Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS). Item II (FAR Case 2008-009), an
interim rule entitled "Prohibition on Contracting
with Inverted Domestic Corporations" implements
Section 743 of Division D of the Omnibus
Appropriations Act, 2009, which
prohibits the award of contracts using appropriated
funds to any foreign incorporated entity that is
treated as an
href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-15434.pdf">inverted
domestic corporation or to any subsidiary of one.
An inverted domestic corporation is one that used to
be incorporated in the United States, or used to be a
partnership in the United States, but now is
incorporated in a foreign country, or is a subsidiary
whose parent corporation is incorporated in a foreign
country, the purpose being to avoid United States
taxes on business income generated in foreign
countries. Item III (FAR Case 2008-028), a
final rule entitled "Role of Interagency
Commission on Debarment and Suspension"
implements Section 873(a)(1) and (2) of the NDAA for
FY 2009. The
rule clarifies the role of the Interagency
Committee on Debarment and Suspension when more
than one agency has an interest in the debarment or
suspension of a contractor. FAC 2005-35
includes one item, FAR
Case 2009-015, entitled "Revocation of
Executive Order 13202," which removes all
references in the FAR to Executive Order 13202, which
had prohibited the
Government from requiring or prohibiting the use of
project labor agreements by its construction
contractors and subcontractors. Federal Acquisition Circular
(FAC) 2005-36
includes the following six items (plus technical
amendments): Item I (FAR Case 2008-038), a
final rule entitled "Federal
Technical Data Solution (FedTeDS)" retires
that system, removes all references to it from the FAR
and substitutes references to the Governmentwide Point
of Entry (GPE) system. Item II (FAR Case
2007-021), a final rule entitled "Fair
Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Act Price
Adjustment Clauses" specifically requires the
inclusion of FAR 52.222-43 and 52.222-44 in time-and-materials and labor-hour service
contracts that are subject to the Service Contract
Act. Item III (FAR Case
2009-014), an interim rule entitled "New
Designated Country--Taiwan" implements the designation of Taiwan under the World
Trade Organization Agreement on Government Procurement
(which took effect on July 15, 2009) and allows
contracting officers to purchase goods and services
made in Taiwan without application of the Buy American
Act if the acquisition is covered by the World Trade
Organization Agreement on Government Procurement. Item IV (FAR Case
2008-004), a final rule entitled "Prohibition
on Restrictions on Business Operations in Sudan and
Imports from Burma" implements
Section 6 of the Sudan Accountability and Divestment
Act of 2007, which requires certification in each
contract entered into by an executive agency that the
contractor does not conduct certain business
operations in Sudan. In addition, in accordance with
Executive Orders 13310 and 13448, Burma is added to
the list of countries from which most imports are
prohibited. Item V (FAR Case
2006-013), a final rule entitled "List
of Approved Attorneys, Abstractors, and Title
Companies" updates
the procedures for the acceptance of a bond with a
security interest in real property because the DOJ has
discontinued maintenance of its former list of
approved abstractors, attorneys, and title companies. Item VI (FAR Case
2007-002), a final rule entitled "Cost
Accounting Standards (CAS) Administration and
Associated FAR Clauses" converts (without
change) the interim rule that revised FAR 30.201 4(b)(1) and FAR
52.230 1 through 52.230 5 to maintain consistency
between the FAR and CAS regarding the administration
of the CAS Board's rules, regulations and standards. FAC 2005-37 has been published and includes
the following seven items (plus technical amendments): Item I (FAR
Case 2008-035), an interim rule entitled
"Registry of Disaster Response Contractors,"
implements Section 697 of
the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations
Act, 2007 (6 U.S.C. 796), which requires (i) FEMA to
establish and maintain a registry of contractors, who
are willing to perform debris removal, distribution of
supplies, reconstruction, and other disaster or
emergency relief activities; and (ii) contracting
officers to consult the Registry during market
research and acquisition planning. Item II (FAR
Case 2007-008), a final rule entitled
"Limiting Length of Noncompetitive Contracts in
Urgent and Compelling Urgency Circumstances," implements section 862 of the Duncan
Hunter NDAA for FY 2009 (Pub. L. 110 417) (hereinafter the
"2009 NDAA") and the OFPP Administrator's
memorandum of May 31, 2007, by limiting the length of
contracts awarded noncompetitively under unusual and
compelling urgency circumstances to the minimum
contract period necessary to meet the requirements,
and no longer than one year, unless the head of the
agency determines that exceptional circumstances
apply. Item III (FAR
Case 2008-026), a final rule entitled "GAO
Access to Contractor Employees," implements section 871 of the 2009
NDAA, which allows the GAO to interview current
contractor employees during the audit of the
contracto' s records. Item IV (FAR
Case 2008-034), an interim rule entitled "Use
of Commercial Services Item Authority," implements section 868 of the 2009 NDAA,
which provides that purchases of commercial services
that are not offered and sold competitively in
substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace
may only be considered commercial items for the
purposes of the FAR if the contracting officer
determines in writing that the offeror has submitted
sufficient information to evaluate, through price
analysis, the reasonableness of the price of such
services. Item V (FAR
Case 2008-031), an interim rule entitled
"Limitations on Pass Through Charges," implements, inter alia,
section 866 of the 2009 NDAA to minimize
excessive pass-through charges by contractors from
subcontractors, or of tiers of subcontractors, that
add no or negligible value, and to ensure that neither
a contractor nor a subcontractor receives indirect
costs or profit/fee (i.e., pass-through
charges) on work performed by a lower-tier
subcontractor to which the higher-tier contractor or
subcontractor adds no, or negligible, value. Item VI (FAR
Case 2008-008), an interim rule entitled
"Award Fee Language Revision," implements
section 814 of the John Warner NDAA for FY 2007, section 867 of
the 2009 NDAA, and the OFPP guidance memorandum dated
December 4, 2007, entitled "Appropriate Use of
Incentive Contracts," and makes an extensive set
of FAR revisions to improve agency decision-making
procedures when using award-fee contracts. Item VII (FAR
Case 2009-003), a final rule entitled
"National Response Framework," amends the FAR to reflect (i) the January
22, 2008, re-issuance of the FEMA National Response
Plan as the National Response Framework and (ii) the
elimination of the term "Incident of National
Significance." Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC2005-38)
has been published. It includes the following six
items plus technical amendments: Item I (FAR
Case 2009-017), entitled "Revocation of
Executive Order 13201, Notification of Employee Rights
Concerning Payment of Union Dues or
Fees," is a final rule that deletes FAR Subpart 22.16 and the
corresponding clause at FAR 52.222-39, Notification
of Employee Rights Concerning Payment of Union Dues or
Fees (which had implemented E.O. 13201 and required
contractors to post a notice informing employees of
their rights concerning payment of union dues or fees
and detailed that employees could not be required to
join unions or maintain membership in unions to retain
their jobs) because that E.O. was revoked by E.O.
13496 of January 30, 2009, entitled "Notification
of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws." See
entry at February 4 below. Item II (FAR
Case 2006-026), entitled "Governmentwide
Purchase Card Restrictions for Treasury Offset Program
Debts ," is a final rule (effective February
1, 2010, that amends the
FAR to restrict the use of the governmentwide
commercial purchase card as a method of payment for
offerors with debts subject to the Treasury Offset
Program. Item III (FAR
Case 2005-041), entitled "Internet Protocol
Version 6 (IPv6)," is a final rule that requires IPv6 compliant products to be
included in all new IT acquisitions using IP, which is
one of the primary mechanisms that define how and
where information moves across networks. Item IV (FAR
Case 2008-017), entitled "Federal Food
Donation Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-247)," is
a final rule (adopting the previous interim rule
without changes) amending the FAR to implement the Federal Food Donation Act
of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-247), which encourages
executive agencies and their contractors, in contracts
for the provision, service, or sale of food, to the
maximum extent practicable and safe, to donate
apparently wholesome excess food to nonprofit
organizations that provide assistance to food-insecure
people in the United States. Item V (FAR
Case 2006-021), entitled "Postretirement
Benefits (PRB) FAS 106," is a final rule
effective January 11, 2010, which amends the FAR to permit contractors to measure accrued
PRB costs using either the criteria in Internal
Revenue Code 419 or the criteria in FAS 106. Item VI (FAR
Case 2006-024), entitled "Travel Costs
," is a final rule effective January 11,
2010, which amends the FAR travel costs principle to ensure a consistent application of the
limitation on allowable contractor airfare costs. Technical Amendments in the
form of editorial
changes are being made to FAR Parts 6, 8, 15, and
52. A proposed rule (FAR Case
2007-021) would amend the FAR to explicitly require
the use of the "Fair Labor Standards Act and
Service Contract Act-Price Adjustment (Multi-Year and
Option Contracts)" clause and the "Fair
Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Act-Price
Adjustment" clause in time-and-materials and
labor-hour contracts that are subject to the Service
Contract Act. The explanatory statements note that
the clauses are widely used in such contracts now but
that the absence of a specific prescription in the FAR
leads to some inconsistencies. Proposed
revisions would conform the FAR to changes in the
SBA's regulations concerning the HUBZone
program. Another proposed rule (FAR Case
2008-015) would change the withholding
requirement for payments under fixed-price
architect-engineer contracts from 10% to an amount
determined by the Contracting Officer as being
necessary to protect the Government's interests. A proposed regulation (FAR Case
2008-023) that would clarify the requirements that
have to be met for a sole
source award to a service-disabled veteran-owned
small business (FAR 19.1406). The proposed rule also
would modify the language in the regulation concerning
sole source awards to HUBZone small businesses (FAR
19.1306) to make it consistent with the changes to the
SDVOSB regulations. The proposed rules respond to the
GAO's decision in the matter of MCS
Portable Restroom Service, B 299291, March 28, 2007. Another proposed rule (FAR Case
2009-005) would implement President Obama's Executive
Order 13502 by adding i) a new FAR Subpart 22.5, Use of Project
Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects;
(ii) a new solicitation provision, entitled
"Notice of Requirement for Project Labor
Agreement," to be included in solicitations where
the agency has exercised its discretion to require a
project labor agreement; and (iii) add a new contract
clause entitled "Project Labor Agreement." An extensive set of proposed
revisions and clarifications to various FAR government
property provisions has been published (FAR Case
2008-011). Comments are due by October 5. FAR Case 2009-013, entitled
"Nonavailable Articles," is a proposal to
revise the list of nonavailable
articles at FAR 25.104(a) to which the Buy
America Act restrictions do not apply. Comments are
due by October 6. FAR Case 2009-009: registration at federalreporting.gov
is now available for contractors required to register
by FAR 52.204-11 pursuant to the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act. Moreover, guidance
has been published to assist federal contractors who
have contracts that are funded, in whole or in part,
by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
and that include the FAR clause at 52.204-11,
in understanding the federalreporting.gov
reporting tool. FAR Case 2008-020: a proposed
rule would amend the FAR to change the procedures for close
out of contract files. FAR Case 2008-016 is a proposed
rule establishing procedures for contracting officers
to report data concerning default terminations and
defective cost or pricing data into the Past
Performance Information System (PPIRS). FAR Case 2008-027 is a proposed rule to amend the
FAR to implement Section 872 of the Duncan Hunter
NDAA for FY 2009, which requires (i) the GSA to establish and
maintain a data system containing specific information
on the integrity and performance of covered federal
agency contractors and grantees and (ii)
awarding officials to review the data system and
consider other past performance information when
making any past performance evaluation or
responsibility determination. The new data system will
be called the Federal Awardee Performance and
Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). Comments are
due by October 5. FAR Case 2008 025, entitled
"Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest for
Contractor Employees Performing Acquisition
Functions," is a proposal to amend the FAR to
address personal
conflicts of interest by employees of Government
contractors as required by section 841(a) of the
Duncan Hunter NDAA for
FY 2009 (Pub. L. 110-417). Comments are due
by January 12, 2010. Effective January 1, the DoD
issued revised per
diem travel rates for its civilian employees for
travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Mariana
Islands, and possessions of the United States. A slew of regulations were
published on January 15: A final rule entitled
"Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act
Exemptions" (DFARS Case 2007-D022) establishes
the procedures for awarding
a contract to a contractor that is otherwise
excluded from Federal procurement programs due to a
violation of the Clean Air Act or the Clean Water Act. A final rule entitled
"Contract Actions Supporting Contingency
Operations or Facilitating Defense Against or Recovery
From Nuclear, Biological, Chemical, or Radiological
Attack" (DFARS Case 2008-D026) lowers the
required level of DoD approval for determinations
with regard to the use of emergency acquisition
flexibilities for contract actions supporting
contingency operations or facilitating defense against
or recovery from nuclear, biological, chemical, or
radiological attack. A final rule entitled
"Delegation of Authority for Single Award Task or
Delivery Order Contracts" (DFARS Case 2008-D017)
specifies that the authority to award of a
single source task or delivery order contract
exceeding $100 million may not be delegated below
the level of the senior procurement executive. A final rule entitled "DoD
Law of War Program" (DFARS Case 2006-D035)
includes requirements for DoD contractors to institute
effective programs to prevent violations of the law of
war by contractor
personnel authorized to accompany U.S. Armed
Forces deployed outside the U.S. A final rule entitled "List
of Firms Owned or Controlled by the Government of a
Terrorist Country" (DFARS Case 2008-D025)
establishes procedures
for notifying the appropriate DoD office that a
firm or its subsidiary may be owned or controlled by
the government of a terrorist country. An interim rule, with a request
for comments, entitled "Pilot Program for
Transition to Follow-On Contracting After Use of Other
Transaction Authority" (DFARS Case 2008-D030)
amends the DoD pilot program addressed in DFARS
Subpart 212.70 "Pilot Program for Transition to
Follow-On Contracting After Use of Other Transaction
Authority" by establishing a new program
expiration date of September 30, 2010, and adding
items developed under research projects in accordance
with 10 U.S.C. 2371 to the types of items to which the
program applies. A final rule entitled
"Security-Guard Functions" (DFARS Case
2006-D050) adopts without change the previous interim
rule extending until September 30, 2012, the period
during which contractor
performance of security-guard functions at military
installations or facilities is authorized to
fulfill additional requirements resulting from the
terrorist attacks on the United States on September
11, 2001. An interim rule, with a request
for comments, entitled "Senior DoD Officials
Seeking Employment With Defense Contractors"
(DFARS Case 2008-D007) amends the DFARS to implement
Section 847 of the NDAA for FY 2008, section 847 of which addresses
requirements for senior DoD officials to obtain a
post-employment ethics opinion before accepting a
position from a DoD contractor within two years after
leaving DoD service. A final rule entitled
"Separation of Senior Roles in Source
Selection" (DFARS Case 2008-D037) requires the
military departments and defense agencies to certify
every two years that no senior leader has performed multiple
roles in the acquisition of a major weapon system
or major service. Another interim rule with
request for comments, entitled "Statutory Waiver
for Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf Items"
(DFARS Case 2008-D009) implements a determination made
by the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy on
February 14, 2008, in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 431,
that the Buy
American Act domestic component test is
inapplicable to acquisitions of COTS items so that a
COTS item will be treated as a domestic end product if
it is manufactured in the U.S., without the need to
track the origin of the item s components. An interim rule with request for
comments entitled "Steel for Military
Construction Projects" (DFARS Case 2008 D038)
requires that American steel producers, fabricators,
and manufacturers be given the opportunity to compete
for contracts and subcontracts for the
acquisition of steel for use in military construction
projects or activities. A final rule entitled
"U.S.-International Atomic Energy Agency
Additional Protocol" (DFARS Case 2004-D003) adds
a contract clause for use in contracts for research
and development or major defense acquisition programs
involving fissionable materials, other radiological
source materials, or technologies directly related to
nuclear power production, requires a contractor
to notify DoD if the contractor is required to report
its activities under the U.S.-International
Atomic Energy Agency Additional Protocol. An interim rule with request for
comments entitled "Whistleblower Protections for
Contractor Employees" (DFARS Case 2008 D012)
addresses protections for contractor employees who
disclose information to government officials with
regard to waste
or mismanagement, danger to public health or
safety, or violation of law related to a DoD contract. Because it exceeded its 5%
contracting goal in 2008, the DoD has suspended its
10% price
evaluation adjustment for small disadvantaged
businesses from March 13, 2009 to March 12, 2010. New per
diem rates have been published for travel by
government employees in Alaska, Hawaii,
Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and United
States Possessions. The DoD solicited suggestions
from contractors concerning its acquisition strategy
to fulfill the requirement that contractors working
outside the United States have Defense
Base Act insurance to provide workers compensation
benefits in accordance with Section 843 of the
NDAA for FY 2009. The DoD sought comments
concerning its upcoming revision of the Commercial
Item Handbook. Several
DFARS regulations were issued on July 15-- DFARS Case 2008-D011 is an interim rule amending the
DFARS to implement Sections 805 and 815 of the
NDAA for FY 2008. It lists the conditions under which (i) a
time-and-materials or labor hour contract may be used
for the acquisition of commercial items and (ii) major
weapon systems and subsystems may be treated as
commercial items. DFARS Case 2006-D013
is a final rule implementing statutory provisions
relating to the leasing of vessels, aircraft, and
combat vehicles. It applies to long-term leases and
charters and to contracts with a substantial
termination liability. DFARS Case 2006-D051
is an interim rule
implementing Section 802 of the NDAA for FY 2008, which places
limitations on the award of new contracts for lead
system integrator functions in the acquisition of
major DoD systems. DFARS Case 2008-D044 is a final rule implementing
Section 803 of the NDAA for FY 2009, which requires the DoD to
identify and evaluate, at all stages of the
acquisition process, opportunities for the use of
commercial computer software and other
nondevelopmental software. DFARS Case 2008-D005 is an interim rule implementing
Section 801 of the NDAA for FY 2008, which requires internal controls
for procurements made by non-DoD agencies on behalf of
DoD. The DoD (DFARS
Case 2007-D011) is also proposing revisions to the
DFARS to clarify requirements regarding definitization
of letter contracts and to specify that DoD letter
contracts will be definitized using the DFARS
procedures applicable to all other undefinitized
contractual actions. Comments are due by September 14. The DFARS (section 212.207(b))
has been corrected by adding the words "commercial
item" in two places to clarify the particular
definition to which that section is referring in
specifying the types of services to which the rule
applies. The following DFARS amendments
were published on July 29: DFARS Case 2008-D035, entitled "Peer
Reviews of Contracts," is a final rule that
adds, inter alia, a DFARS section 201.170
("Peer Reviews"), which (i) specifies that
the Office of the Director, Defense Procurement and
Acquisition Policy, will organize teams of reviewers
and will facilitate Peer Reviews for all solicitations
valued at $1 billion or more and for all contracts for
services valued at $1 billion or more and (ii)
requires the military departments, defense agencies,
and DoD field activities to establish procedures for
pre-award Peer Review of solicitations valued at less
than $1 billion, and postaward Peer Review of
contracts for services valued at less than $1 billion. DFARS Case 2008-D003, entitled "Restriction
on Acquisition of Specialty Metals," is a
final rule that implements Section 842 of the NDAA for
FY 2007 and
Sections 804 and 884 of the NDAA for FY 2008 by
addressing restrictions on the acquisition of
specialty metals not melted or produced in the United
States. DFARS Case 2008-D010,
entitled "Clarification
of Central Contractor Registration and Procurement
Instrument Identification Data Requirements,"
is a final rule addressing requirements for ensuring
the accuracy of contractor information in the CCR
database and in contract documents and clarifying the
requirements for proper assignment of procurement
instrument identification numbers. DFARS Case 2007-D006, entitled "Contract
Reporting," is a final rule that updates
DFARS text addressing reporting of contract actions,
to remove references to obsolete reporting form DD
350, and to address current DoD procedures for
reporting of contract actions in the Federal
Procurement Data System ("FPDS"). DFARS Case 2007-D020,
entitled "Government
Property," is a final rule that extensively
updates text throughout the DFARS addressing the
management of government property in the possession of
contractors. The updates
are consistent with changes made to the FAR. DFARS Case 2007-D008, entitled "Protection
of Human Subjects in Research Projects,"
is a final rule that adds DFARS policy (i) addressing
requirements for the ethical treatment of human
subjects involved in research projects, (ii) adding a
clause for use in contracts involving human subjects
in research, and (iii) informing contractors of their
responsibilities for compliance with 32 CFR Part 219;
DoD Directive 3216.02; applicable DoD component
policies; 10 U.S.C. 980; and, when applicable, FDA
policies and regulations. DFARS Case 2008-D029, entitled "Requirements
Applicable to Undefinitized Contract Actions,"
is a final rule that (i) requires DoD departments and
agencies to submit semi-annual reports regarding
undefinitized contract actions exceeding $5 million;
and (ii) establishes requirements for (a) obligation
of funds for the undefinitized period consistent with
the contractor s proposal for that period; and (b)
compliance with existing DFARS policy relating to
profit computation for undefinitized contract actions. DFARS Case 2008-D046, entitled "Trade
Agreements--Costa Rica and Peru," is an
interim rule that amends trade agreement provisions
and clauses in DFARS Part 252 to implement the
Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free
Trade Agreement with respect to Costa Rica, and the
United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement, which
were approved by Congress in the Dominican
Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade
Agreement Implementation Act and
the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement
Implementation Act. DFARS Case 2008-D040, entitled "Motor
Carrier Fuel Surcharge," is an interim rule
to implement Section 884 of the NDAA for FY 2009, which requires
the DoD to ensure that fuel-related adjustments in
contracts for carriage are passed through to the
person bearing the cost of the fuel to which the
adjustment relates. On November 19, the DoD adopted
five previously interim rules, without any changes, as
final DFARS rules: DFARS Case 2008-D007 (entitled
"Senior DoD Officials Seeking Employment with
Defense Contractors") implements section 847 of
the NDAA for FY 2008, which addresses requirements for senior DoD
officials to obtain a
post-employment ethics opinion before accepting
compensation from a DoD contractor within two years
after leaving DoD service. DFARS Case 2008-D012 (entitled
"Whistleblower Protections for Contractor
Employees") implements section 846 of the
NDAA for FY 2008 and section 842 of the NDAA for FY 2009, which address protections
for contractor employees who disclose information
to government officials with regard to waste or
mismanagement, danger to public health or safety, or
violation of law related to a DoD contract. DFARS Case 2008-D015 (entitled
"Competition Requirements for Purchases from
Federal Prison Industries ") implements section
827 of the NDAA for
FY 2008, which requires the use of
competitive procedures in the acquisition of items for
which Federal
Prison Industries has a significant market share. DFARS Case 2008-D030 (entitled
"Pilot Program for Transition to Follow-On
Contracting After Use of Other Transaction
Authority") implements section 824 of the
NDAA for FY 2009, which amended the DoD pilot program for
transition to follow-on contracting after use of other
transaction authority, to establish a new program
expiration date and to include items developed under
research projects within the scope of the program. The
pilot
program provides that certain items which do not
otherwise meet the definition of "commercial item"
may be treated as commercial items in the award of
contracts and subcontracts that follow an other
transaction agreement. DFARS 2008-D038 (entitled
"Steel for Military Construction Projects")
implements section 108 of the Military Construction
and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, 2009, which
requires that American steel producers, fabricators,
and manufacturers be given the opportunity to compete
for contracts and subcontracts for the acquisition
of steel for use in military construction projects or
activities. DFARS Case 2009-D010: The DoD
published an interim rule (effective November 23)
amending several clauses in Part 252 of the DFARS to
add Taiwan
as a designated country to the list of World Trade
Organization Government Procurement Agreement
designated countries, due to the accession of Taiwan
to the World Trade Organization Government Procurement
Agreement. DFARS Case 2008-D039: The DoD
issued an interim rule (effective November 23)
amending the DFARS to implement section 825 of the
Duncan Hunter NDAA for
FY 2009 (Pub. L. 110 417), which clarifies
the Government s rights in technical data in the
designs of DoD vessels, boats, craft, and components
thereof, and the Vessel Hull Design Protection
Amendments of 2008 (Pub. L. 110 434). Several more DFARS regs were
published on December 24: DFARS Case 2007-D004,
entitled "Allowability of Costs to Lease
Government Equipment for Display or
Demonstration," is a final rule specifying that monies paid to the Government for the
leasing
of government equipment are unallowable, except in
the case of foreign military sales contracts. DFARS Case 2005-D010,
entitled "Definitions of Component and Domestic
Manufacture," revises the definitions of those
terms in order to clarify
the distinction between foreign acquisition policies
that apply only to top-level components
of end products and those that apply to both
top-level and lower-tier components of end products. DFARS Case 2008-D009,
entitled "Statutory Waiver for Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf Items," adopts as final
(without change) the interim rule conforming the DFARS
to the FAR changes
implementing the waiver
of the component test of the Buy American Act to
contracts and subcontracts for the acquisition of COTS
items. Effective December 28, the Under
Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics) is waived
the limitation of 10 U.S.C. 2534 (which limits DoD
procurement of certain items to sources in the
national technology and industrial base) for the
following defense items produced in the UK: 1. Air
circuit breakers; 2.
Welded shipboard anchor and mooring chain with a
diameter of four inches or less; 3.
Gyrocompasses; 4.
Electronic navigation chart systems; 5.
Steering controls; 6.
Pumps; 7.
Propulsion and machinery control systems; and 8.
Totally enclosed lifeboats. The DoD adopted as final (with
only a minor change) the interim rule that amended the
DFARS to implement Section 802(a) of the NDAA for FY 2007 (and
DoD policy mandates) to require the DoD to assess long-term
technical data and computer software needs when
acquiring major weapon systems and subsystems. The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) proposed amending its regulations
(at 15 C.F.R. Part 701) concerning the reporting of offset
agreements in sales of weapon systems or
defense-related items to foreign countries or foreign
firms in order to update and provide clarification
with regard to the information U.S. companies are
required to submit each year to BIS to support the
preparation of the annual report to Congress on
offsets in defense trade. The BIS has published
revisions to the Commerce Control List (CCL) in the
Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to implement changes made to the
Wassenaar Arrangement s List of Dual
Use Goods and Technologies maintained and agreed
to by governments participating in the Wassenaar
Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms
and Dual Use Goods and Technologies. The BIS published a final rule
to amend certain requirements in the EAR that apply to
Albania
and Croatia, based upon the accession of those two
countries to formal membership in NATO on April 1,
2009.Executive Orders
Regulations
Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR)
Federal
Acquisition Circulars (FAC)
FAC 2005-29,
Amendment 1
FAC 2005-30
FAC 2005-31
FAC 2005-32
FAC 2005-33
FAC 2005-34
FAC 2005-35
FAC 2005-36
FAC 2005-37
FAC 2005-38
Other FAR Revisions
Department of Defense FAR
Supplement (DFARS)
Other Agencies
Bureau of
Industry and Security
Commerce Department
The National Technology Information Service of the Department of Commerce is accepting orders for the 2009 edition of the Export Administration Regulations.
Defense Department
The DoD issued an interim final rule adding a Part 159 to 32 C.F.R. entitled "Private Security Contractors Operating in Contingency Operations," which "establishes policy, assigns responsibilities and provides procedures for the regulation of the selection, accountability, training, equipping, and conduct of personnel performing private security functions under a covered contract. It also assigns responsibilities and establishes procedures for incident reporting, use of and accountability for equipment, rules for the use of force, and a process for administrative action or the removal, as appropriate, of" private security contractors and their personnel."
The DoD's Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee published Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 265, which lists revisions in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and U.S. Possessions.
Energy Department
The DOE published lengthy, detailed regulations concerning the federal procurement of energy efficient products pursuant to the National Energy Conservation Policy Act. The final rule became effective April 13.
The Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) was amended to revise the security clause used in all contracts and subcontracts involving access authorizations to specifically require background reviews, and tests for the absence of any illegal drug, as defined in DOE regulations of uncleared personnel (employment applicants and current employees), who will require access authorizations. Background reviews will not be required for applicants for DOE access authorization who possess a current access authorization from another Federal agency.
Effective August 21, the Department of Energy issued an extensive set of technical amendments and corrections to its acquisition regulations (the DEAR).
Environmental Protection Agency
The EPA amended its acquisition regulation (the EPAAR) to revise the prescription for and the content of the "Technical Direction" clause by adding and defining two terms: (i) contracting officer technical representative and (ii) task order.
The EPA amended various provisions in the EPAAR concerning government property in order to consolidate the EPAAR physical property clauses (Decontamination, Fabrication, and Government Property), re-designate the prescription number in the data clause, and update the roles and responsibilities of the contractor, DCMA and CPC.
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board
Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92 463), as amended, the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) released the Exposure Draft on Subsequent Events: Codification of Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards Contained in the AICPA Statements on Auditing Standards. AU Section 560, Subsequent Events, of the AICPA Statements on Auditing Standards includes accounting and financial reporting guidance that is not discussed in the authoritative literature that establishes accounting principles. The objective of the proposed Statement is to incorporate that guidance into the authoritative literature of the FASAB. The Exposure Draft is available here.
General Services Administration (GSA)
The GSA rewrote GSAR Part 502 re definitions of words and terms (GSAR Case 2008-0501); Part 503 re improper business practices and personal conflicts of interest; Part 509 re contractor qualifications (GSAR Case 2006-G512); Part 511 re describing agency needs (effective January 14, 2010); Part 513 re simplified acquisition procedures; Part 514 re sealed bidding; Part 528, covering bonds and insurance; Part 525 re foreign acquisition; Part 532, contract financing;Part 537 entitled service contracting; Part 542 regarding contract administration and audit services (GSAR Case 2008-G512 ); Part 543 regarding contract modifications (GSAR Case 2008-G513); Part 546 covering quality assurance; and Part 549 covering termination of contracts.
The agency removed Part 547 (Transportation) from the GSAR.
The agency amended the GSAR by adding a Part 519.70 to establish a mentor-protege program (i) to encourage GSA prime contractors to assist small businesses, including veteran-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, HUBZone, small disadvantaged businesses, and women-owned small businesses, in enhancing their capabilities to perform contracts and subcontracts for GSA and other Federal agencies; (ii) to increase the base of small businesses eligible to perform GSA contracts and subcontracts; and (iii) to foster long-term business relationships between GSA prime contractors and small business entities and to increase the overall number of small business entities that receive GSA contracts, and subcontract awards.
Federal Travel Regulation
GSA Bulletin 09-02 clarifies the Federal Travel Regulation by describing the situations in which those on travel may be reimbursed for various special fees, including fees for checked baggage and seat assignments. The bulletin, itself, may be found by scrolling down to the "Bulletins" section on this page.
The IRS and the GSA standard relocation mileage rate for privately owned vehicles has been reduced to $0.24 per mile for calendar year 2009.
In Per Diem Bulletin 09-05, the GSA revised the Federal Travel Regulation CONUS maximum per diem rates for Idaho, Maryland, and South Carolina.
The GSA amended the Federal Travel Regulation to clarify that travelers must deduct the appropriate amounts from their meals and incidental expense allowance when meals are part of a registration fee or otherwise paid for by the Government, in conjunction with attendance at conferences or other events while on official travel. The amendments also clarify that in limited instances, agencies may allow employees to claim the full allowance for meals when employees are unable to consume meals furnished by the Government. Effective May 11, the GSA has clarified the meal and incidental expense allowance for travel in excess of 12 hours but less than 24 hours.
Effective August 20, the GSA amended the FTR to update the list of travel purpose identifiers and incorporate new descriptive language for each identifier to enhance how travel costs are identified by Federal agencies.
With the publication of Bulletin 10-01, the GSA revised the per diem rates for use in the continental United States for fiscal 2010. The GSA also has revised the FTR to include an updated table of meal cost adjustments for meals furnished by the Government or included in ticket prices.
The GSA amended FTR provisions covering premium class travel and transportation allowances.
Government Accountability Office(GAO)
The GAO issued Principles of Federal Appropriations Law, Third Edition, Volume III, which supersedes the Second Edition, Volume IV, published in 2001.
Health and Human Services (HHS)
HHS published a complete revision of its acquisition regulation (the HHSAR) to reflect statutory, FAR, and governmentwide and HHS policy changes since the last revision to the HHSAR in December 2006. The revision will become effective January 26, 2010.
Homeland Security
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued an interim rule amending Parts 3025 and 3052 of its acquisition regulations (HSAR) to reflect restrictions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on the purchase of certain foreign textile products (HSAR Case 2009-004). To be considered in connection with the final rule, comments must be submitted by September 16.
The Office of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services extended until March 4 the date for comments on the interim final rule originally published December 17, 2008 concerning the types of documentation acceptable for employment eligibility verification. The interim final rule, itself, was extended until April 3.
DHS issued a final rule amending the Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation (HSAR) to prohibit awards of s Federal Protective Service guard services contracts to firms owned, controlled, or operated by an individual who has been convicted of a serious felony. The rule is necessary to implement the provisions of Public Law 110-356, the Federal Protective Service Guard Contracting Reform Act of 2008.
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Pursuant to the requirements of Executive Order 13502, HUD removed a regulation that prohibits the use of project labor agreements on federal construction projects.
Labor Department
The Office of Labor Management Standards of The Department of Labor rescinded the regulations at 29 C.F.R. Part 470, which had required government contractors and subcontractors to post certain notices concerning the rights of union workers. This action is the result of President Obama's Executive Order 13496, which rescinds Executive Order 13201.
NASA
NASA amended its FAR Supp regulations concerning its mentor-protege program, inter alia, expand it to cover Veteran-owned, HUBZone, and NASA Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II small businesses.
National Science Foundation
The NSF implemented final regulations covering the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
In accordance with the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3520), OMB published lists of (i) the compliance assistance resources available to small businesses and (ii) the points of contacts in agencies to act as a liaison between the agency and small business concerns with respect to the collection of information and the control of paperwork.
Postal Service
The Postal Service published the final revisions to the rules of practice for the Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals, which was re-established by Section 847 of the NDAA for FY 2006. The final rules became effective June 1.
Small Business Administration (SBA)
The SBA issued a new definition (effective May 3, 2010) of the term "employee" for purposes of the HUBZone program. The new definition at 13 C.F.R. 126.103 reads as follows: "Employee means all individuals employed on a full-time, part-time, or other basis, so long as that individual works a minimum of 40 hours per month. This includes employees obtained from a temporary employee agency, leasing concern, or through a union agreement or co-employed pursuant to a professional employer organization agreement. SBA will consider the totality of the circumstances, including criteria used by the IRS for Federal income tax purposes and those set forth in SBA s Size Policy Statement No. 1, in determining whether individuals are employees of a concern. Volunteers (i.e.,individuals who receive deferred compensation or no compensation, including no in-kind compensation, for work performed) are not considered employees. However, if an individual has an ownership interest in and works for the HUBZone SBC a minimum of 40 hours per month, that owner is considered an employee regardless of whether or not the individual receives compensation."
The SBA published a document entitled "SBA Size Standards Methodology," which explains the SBA's process for analyzing and adjusting its size standards.
The SBA waived the nonmanufacturer rule for Conductor and Control Cable (Aluminum); Conductor and Control Cable (Copper); Truck Trailer; All terrain vehicles (ATVs), wheeled or tracked; Snowmobiles and parts; Off-road ATV, wheeled or tracked; Noncurrent-Carrying Wiring Device Manufacturing, i.e., dead end tees and connectors, guy strain and link assemblies, bolts, washers, turnbuckles, twisted clips, steel angle assemblies, yoke plates, compression T connectors, press dies, anchor shackles, Y clevis ball and Y clevis sockets, yoke plates, and grounding clamps.
The SBA waived the nonmanufacturer rule for PSC 9130--Liquid Propellants--Petroleum Base Manufacturing.
Effective April 1, the SBA terminated its waiver of the nonmanufacturer rule for PSC 3930, Warehouse Trucks and Tractors, Self-Propelled based on SBA s recent discovery of small business manufacturers of these items.
Effective July 29, the SBA waived the nonmanufacturer rule for 13 Watt CFLs, 26 Watt CFLs, and Occupancy Sensors Dual Technology.
The SBA terminated its waiver of the Nonmanufacturer Rule for radio telephones based on the SBA s recent discovery of a small business manufacturer. Terminating this waiver will require recipients of contracts set aside for small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, or Participants in the SBA's 8(a) Business Development Program to provide the products of small business manufacturers or processors on such contracts.
The SBA published an interim final rule that implements certain provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 affecting small business investment companies (SBICs). These provisions increase the maximum amount of SBA leverage available to an SBIC, change the calculation of the maximum investment size that an SBIC is permitted to make, and simplify the requirement for an SBIC to devote a portion of its investment activity to smaller enterprises.
The SBA published a comprehensive list of all the currently approved class waivers from the nonmanufacturer rule.
The SBA issued an interim final rule implementing provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act that pertain to the Surety Bond Guaranty (SBG) Program. Specifically, until September 30, 2010, the SBA is authorized (i) to guarantee bonds on contracts of up to $5,000,000 (or up to $10 million based upon the certification of a federal contracting officer) and (ii) to partially deny liability under its bond guarantee (but not on the basis of material facts disclosed to SBA in a guarantee application submitted under the Prior Approval Program). The rule also revises the size standard for participation in the SBG Program.
The SBA issued an interim rule adjusting various acquisition-related dollar thresholds to account for inflation.
The SBA proposed to terminate the nonmanufacturer waiver for radio telephones. Comments are due by August 19. The SBA is also proposing to eliminate the class waiver under PSC 9130 for Liquid Propellants--Petroleum Base. Comments are due by August 21.
The SBA proposed to increase the size standards for (i) five industries in NAICS Sector 72, Accommodation and Food Services: NAICS 721110, Hotels and Motels (from $7.0 million to $30 million); NAICS 721120, Casino Hotels (from $7.0 million to $30 million); NAICS 722211, Limited Service Restaurants (from $7.0 million to $10 million); NAICS 722212, Cafeterias (from $7.0 million to $25.5 million); and NAICS 722310, Food Service Contractors (from $20.5 million to $35.5 million); (ii) 18 industries in NAICS Sector 81, Other Services (The explanatory comments for the proposed changes are quite detailed and lengthy, but you can find a table listing the specific changes proposed for those 18 industries at 74 Fed. Reg. 53950 (Oct. 21, 2009)); and (iii) 48 industries in NAICS Sector, Retail Trade (A lengthy table listing both the industries affected by the proposed changes and those that will remain unchanged begins at 74 Fed. Reg. 53929 (Oct. 21, 2009)).
The SBA proposed to amend its joint venture affiliation, 8(a), and mentor-protege regulations in several important respects. First, whereas the current rule at 13 C.F.R. 121.3(h) limits joint ventures to submitting three offers over a two year period, the proposed rule changes the limit to three awarded contracts over that period. Moreover, the proposed rule makes clear that it is not intended as an absolute prohibition against the joint venture competing for more than three contracts, but only a statement that its members will be treated as affiliates if it does so. Secondly, the proposed rule specifically recognizes and allows the current practice of two entities who have reached the basic limit forming a new joint venture, but adds this caution: "At some point, however, such a longstanding inter-relationship or contractual dependence between the same joint venture partners will lead to a finding of general affiliation between and among them. For purposes of this provision and in order to facilitate tracking of the number of contract awards made to a joint venture, a joint venture must be in writing and must do business under its own name. . . ." These same rules will apply to SBA mentor-protege joint ventures involving an 8(a) protege. Third, the proposed rule emphasizes that the SBA is the only agency that may determine there is an exception from affiliation between a mentor and its protege, even in mentor-protege programs purportedly established by other agencies, such as the DoD's program. There are many other proposed revisions to the 8(a) and mentor-protege regulations. This is major proposed rulemaking that should be studied carefully.
State Department
The State Department amended the ITAR regarding Congressional certification for South Korea, which is now in the same category as the countries in NATO, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand requiring certification to Congress prior to granting any license for export of major defense equipment sold under a contract in the amount of $25,000,000 or more, or for defense articles or defense services sold under a contract in the amount of $100,000,000 or more.
Another ITAR amendment added an exemption for the temporary export of body armor for exclusive personal use to destinations not subject to restrictions under the ITAR 126.1 and to Afghanistan and Iraq under specified conditions.
The State Department proposed to amend Section 126.6 of the ITAR (pertaining to U.S. Government transfer programs and foreign-owned military aircraft and naval vessels) to clarify the circumstances when a license by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls is not required. Comments are due by January 25, 2010.
Another proposed ITAR amendment (22 C.F.R. 125.4(b)(9)) would clarify that the exemption for technical data covers data, regardless of media or format, sent or taken by a U.S. person who is an employee of a U.S. corporation or a U.S. Government agency to a U.S. person employed by that U.S. corporation or to a U.S. Government agency outside the United States. Comments are due by January 25, 2010.
Treasury Department
Beginning January 1, 2010, the CDA prompt payment interest rate is 3 1/4 percent.
Department of Transportation
The Department of Transportation issued several proposed rules concerning its Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program, relating to (i) counting items obtained by a DBE subcontractor from its prime contractor; (ii) encouraging "unbundling" of contracts to facilitate participation by small businesses, including DBEs; (iii) improvements to the DBE application form; (iv) program oversight; (v) facilitating certification for firms seeking to work as DBEs in more than one state; and (vi) limitations on the discretion of prime contractors to terminate DBEs for convenience, once the prime contractor has committed to using the DBE as part of its showing of good faith efforts.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
The USDA issued a final rule defining the following nine categories of biobased products that will receive federal procurement preference under the as provided for under section 9002 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, as amended by the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008: (i) chain and cable lubricants; (ii) corrosion preventatives; (iii) food cleaners; (iv) forming lubricants; (v) Gear lubricants; (vi) general purpose household cleaners; (vii) industrial cleaners; (viii) multipurpose cleaners; and (ix) parts wash solutions. The USDA established a minimum biobased content requirement for each of these items.
Veterans Affairs
The VA announced it intends to deviate from the FAR 32.905 by adding an interim clause to the VA Acquisition Regulation, which will allow vendors to voluntarily submit invoices electronically.
The VA amended its acquisition regulation (the VAAR) to implement portions of the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 (the Act) and Executive Order 13360, by permitting VA contracting officers either to restrict competitions to SDVOSBs or VOSBs or to award sole source contracts to such entities. The VA also issued an interim rule authorizing the VA to hear protests of SDVOSB and VOSB status until the VA and the SBA have completed the process of executing an interagency agreement so that the SBA can hear such protests.