2010 Procurement Review: Statutes, Regulations, Executive Orders
Statutes
Individual Agencies
- Overview
- Agriculture
- Army
- Bureau of Industry and Security
- Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
- Department of Justice (DOJ)
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- General Services Administration (GSA)
- Health and Human Services (HHS)
- Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
- Interior
- NASA
- Navy
- Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP)
- Small Business Administration (SBA)
- State
- Transportation
- Treasury
- USAID
- Veterans Affairs
Statutes
The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, inter alia, closes the loophole that had favored HUBZone business during set asides, and places HUBZone, SDVOSB, and women-owned small businesses in parity with one another.
The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010, inter alia, requires information in the FAPIIS system, except past performance information, to be publicly available.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010, inter alia, requires agencies to prepare annual inventories of service contracts.
Executive Orders and Related Publications
Executive Order 13256 (dated Dec. 29, 2009 and published January 5, 2010) "prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information, including information relating to defense against transnational terrorism." It is accompanied by a memorandum to agencies containing directions for implementing the E. O., as well as a document listing those officials who are authorized to classify items as SECRET or TOP SECRET.
Executive Order 13549 (dated August 18, 2010) establishes (and provides details of) a Classified National Security Information Program designed to safeguard and govern access to classified national security information shared by the Federal Government with State, local, tribal, and private sector entities.
President Obama issued a memorandum dated March 10 entitled "Finding and Recapturing Improper Payments," which directs OMB to develop guidance within 90 days for increased use of Payment Recapture Audits to identify improper payments that have been made to contractors.
The President issued two more memoranda on April 26 establishing interagency task forces to increase federal contracting opportunities for (i) small businesses and (ii) veteran-owned and service disabled veteran-owned small businesses. Pursuant to these memoranda regarding enhancing the use of small businesses in federal contracting, interested parties were invited to offer their views concerning (i) removing barriers to small business participation in federal contracting; (ii) using innovative strategies and technologies to increase opportunities for small business contractors; and (iii) identifying successful agency and private sector outreach practices for matching small businesses with contracting and subcontracting opportunities. A public meeting on these issues will be held on June 28 in the auditorium of the Department of Commerce at 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, D.C.
Presidential Determination No. 2010-13 continued for one year the exercise of certain authorities under the Trading with the Enemy Act with respect to Cuba, as implemented by the Cuban Assets Control Regulations at 31 C.F.R. Part 515.
Regulations
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Federal Acquisition Circulars (FAC)
FAC 2005-39
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-039 included the following six items, plus a technical amendment:
FAR Case 2009-035: A final rule revised FAR subpart 13.5 ("Test Program for Certain Commercial Items") to implement section 816 of the NDAA for FY 2010 by extending the program for two more years.
FAR Case 2008-012: a final rule adopted the prior interim rule, with a few changes, to implement section 814 of the NDAA for FY 2008, which requires alignment of the threshold for cost or pricing data on noncommercial modifications of commercial items with the TINA threshold for cost or pricing data.
FAR Case 2008-040: A inal rule (i) revised FAR Parts 15 and 53 instructions for use of the SF 26 to strengthen the prohibition against using block 18 of the form when awarding a negotiated procurement and to emphasize that block 18 should only be checked when awarding a sealed bid contract and (ii) revising the final sentence of the current FAR 53.214 because the updated SF 26, which was issued in April 2008, makes the sentence unnecessary.
FAR Case 2008-006: A inal rule adopted the prior interim rule with changes and a amnded the FAR to implement Section 843 of the NDAA for FY 2008. which contains several requirements regarding enhancing competition within federal contracting, including: (i) limitation on single-award task and delivery-order contracts greater than $100 million; (2) enhanced competition for task and delivery orders in excess of $5 million; and (3) restrictions on protests in connection with issuance or proposed issuance of a task- or delivery-order except for a protest on the grounds that the order increases the scope, period, or maximum value of the contract under which the order is issued, or a protest of an order valued in excess of $10 million.
FAR Case 2008-036: A final rule adopted the prior interim rule amending the FAR to implement the Dominican Republic--Central America--United States Free Trade Agreement with respect to Costa Rica, the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement, and the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement.
FAR Case 2008-015: A final rule amended the FAR to revise the withholding of payment requirements under FAR 52.232-10, a change that was initiated by the SBA's Advocacy Office, a part of the SBA Office of Advocacy's Regulatory Review and Reform Initiative ("r3 initiative"), which was established to help small businesses address the cumulative federal regulatory burden.
FAC 2005-40
FAC 2005-40 consisted of one item, FAR Case 2008-007, a final rule implementing the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), as required by section 872 of the Duncan Hunter NDAA for FY 2009. FAPIIS is designed to improve the Government's ability to evaluate the business ethics and expected performance quality of prospective contractors and protect the Government from awarding contracts to contractors that are not responsible sources.
FAC 2005-41
FAC 2005-41 also contained one item, FAR Case 2009-005 ("Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects"), a final rule that implements Executive Order 13502 by amending the the FAR (i) to provide that an agency may, if appropriate, require that every contractor and subcontractor engaged in construction on a federal construction project agree, for that project, to negotiate or become a party to a project labor agreement with one or more labor organizations, (ii) to identify factors that agencies may consider to help them decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether the use of a project labor agreement is likely to promote economy and efficiency in the performance of a specific construction project, and (iii) to identify multiple strategies for timing the Federal Government s receipt of project labor agreements.
FAC 2005-42
FAC 2005-42 included the following 11 items plus technical amendments:
Item I (FAR Case 2009-012) entitled "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009--Whistleblower Protections" is a final rule adopting (with changes) the interim rule amending the FAR to implement section 1553 of Division A of the Recovery Act ("Protecting State and Local Government and Contractor Whistleblowers") by prohibiting non-Federal employers from discharging, demoting, or discriminating against an employee as a reprisal for disclosing information.
Item II (FAR Case 2005-040) entitled "Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS)" is a final rule amending the FAR to require that contractors small business subcontract reports be submitted using the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS), rather than Standard Form 294 - Subcontract Report for Individual Contracts and Standard Form 295 - Summary Subcontract Report.
Item III (FAR Case 2009-010) entitled "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009--Publicizing Contract Actions" is a final rule adopting (with changes) an interim rule amending the FAR to implement OMB Memorandum M 09 10, entitled "Initial Implementing Guidance for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009," (the Recovery Act) with respect to publicizing contract actions, which has since been supplemented, amended, and clarified by Memorandum M 09 15.
Item IV (FAR Case 2008-003) entitled "Public Disclosure of Justification and Approval Documents for Noncompetitive Contracts--Section 844 of the NDAA for FY 2008" is a final rule adopting (with changes) an interim rule amending the FAR to implement section 844 of the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act, which details the requirements for the public availability of justifications and approvals after the award of of a federal contract.
Item V (FAR Case 2008-007) entitled "Additional Requirements for Market Research" is an interim rule amending the FAR to implement section 826 of the NDAA for FY 2008, which established additional requirements in subsection (c) of 10 U.S.C. 2377 that, as a matter of policy, are extended to all executive agencies. Specifically, the head of the agency must conduct market research before issuing an ID/IQ task or delivery order for a noncommercial item in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, and a prime contractor with a contract in excess of $5 million for the procurement of items other than commercial items is required to conduct market research before making purchases that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold for or on behalf of the Government.
Item VI (FAR Case 2009-011) entitled "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009--GAO/IG Access" is a final rule adopting (with changes) an interim rule amending the FAR to implement sections 902, 1514, and 1515 of the Recovery Act.
Item VII (FAR Case 2009-014) entitled "New Designated Country--Taiwan" is a final rule adopting (without change) an interim rule amending the FAR to add Taiwan as a designated country, due to the its accession to membership in the World Trade Organization Agreement on Government Procurement.
Item VIII (FAR Case 2009-013) entitled "Nonavailable Articles" is a final rule amending the FAR to revise the list of articles determined to be domestically nonavailable.
Item IX (FAR Case 2009-025) entitled "Disclosure and Consistency of Cost Accounting Practices for Contracts Awarded to Foreign Firms" is an interim rule amending the FAR to align it with the revised CAR Board clause entitled "Disclosure and Consistency of Cost Accounting Practices--Foreign Firms."
Item X (FAR Case 2009-026) entitled "Compensation for Personal Services" is an interim rule amending the FAR to align it with revised CAS 412 ("Cost Accounting Standard for composition and measurement of pension cost") and 415 ("Accounting for the cost of deferred compensation").
Item XI (FAR Case 2009-018) entitled "Payrolls and Basic Records" is an interim rule revising the FAR "Payrolls and Basic Records" clause to implement a DOL rule to protect the privacy of workers.
FAC 2005-43
FAC 2005-43 included the following five items:
Item I (FAR Case 2008-011) entitled "Government Property" is a final rule effective August 2 amending FAR Part 45 (Government Property) and its associated contract clauses.
Item II (FAR Case 2008-035) entitled "Registry of Disaster Response Contractors" is a final rule effective August 2 adopting, without changes, the prior interim rule amending the FAR to implement the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2007, section 697, which requires the establishment and maintenance of a registry of disaster response contractors.
Item III (FAR Case 2010-008) entitled "Recovery Act Subcontract Reporting Procedures" is an interim rule revising the FAR clause at 52.204-11 to (i) to require first-tier subcontractors with Recovery Act funded awards of $25,000 or more, to report jobs information to the prime contractor for reporting into http://FederalReporting.gov and (ii) to require the prime contractor to submit its first report on or before the 10th day after the end of the calendar quarter in which the prime contractor received the award, and quarterly thereafter.
Item IV (FAR Case2008-023) entitled "Clarification of Criteria for Sole Source Awards to Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses" is a final rule effective August 2 that revises the language in FAR 19.1306(a)(1), which deals with sole source awards to HUBZone small business concerns based on 15 U.S.C. 657a(b), to match the language in FAR 19.1406(a)(1) to alleviate confusion on the appropriate use of the criteria needed to conduct a sole source SDVOSB concern acquisition.
Item V (FAR Case 2009-040) entitled "Trade Agreements Thresholds" is an interim rule amending the FAR to incorporate increased thresholds for application of the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement and the Free Trade Agreements, as determined by the United States Trade Representative.
FAC 2005-44
FAC 2005-44 included one item:
FAR Case 2008-039, entitled "Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards," is an interim rule (whose reporting requirements will be implemented in phases) which amends the FAR to implement section 2 of Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-82), as amended by section 6202 of the Government Funding Transparency Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-252), which requires the OMB to establish a free, public, website containing full disclosure of all federal contract award information. This interim rule eventually will require contractors to report executive compensation and first-tier subcontract awards on contracts and orders expected to be $25,000 or more (including all options), except classified contracts and contracts with individuals. This information will be available to the public. The phased reporting requirements are as follow. Until September 30, 2010, any newly awarded subcontract must be reported if the prime contract award amount was $20,000,000 or more. From October 1, 2010, until February 28, 2011, any newly awarded subcontract must be reported if the prime contract award amount was $550,000 or more. Starting March 1, 2011, any newly awarded subcontract must be reported if the prime contract award amount was $25,000 or more.
FAC 2005-45
FAC 2005-45 included the following three items:
FAR Case 2008-024 ("Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds") is a final rule effective October 1 amending the FAR to implement section 807 of the Ronald W. Reagan NDAA for FY 2005, which requires an adjustment every 5 years of acquisition-related thresholds for inflation using the CPI for all urban consumers, except for Davis-Bacon Act, Service Contract Act, and trade agreements thresholds. The FAR Councils have used the same methodology to adjust nonstatutory FAR acquisition-related thresholds in 2010.
FAR Case 2005-036 ("Definition of Cost or Pricing Data") is a final rule effective October 1 amending the FAR to clarify the distinction between "certified cost or pricing data" and "data other than certified cost or pricing data," and to clarify the requirements for the submission of cost or pricing data.
FAR Case 2009-008 ("American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009--Buy American Requirements for Construction Materials") is a final rule effective October 1, adopting, with changes, an interim rule amending the FAR to implement section 1605 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
FAC 2005-46
FAC 2005-46 included the following seven items:
Item I (FAR Case 2009-007), entitled "Equal Opportunity for Veterans," is an interim rule amending the FAR to implement DOL regulations on equal opportunity provisions for various categories of military veterans. This rule sets forth revised coverage and definitions of veterans covered under the Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act of 1972 (VEVRAA) and includes new reporting requirements established under the VEVRAA and the Jobs for Veterans Act (JVA).
Item II (FAR Case 2010-012), entitled "Certification Requirement and Procurement Prohibition relating to Iran Sanctions," is an interim rule amending the FAR to implement section 102 and partially implements section 106 of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010. Section 102 requires certification that each offeror, and any person owned or controlled by the offeror, does not engage in any activity for which sanctions may be imposed under section 5 of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, as amended (the Iran Sanctions Act). Section 106 imposes a procurement prohibition relating to contracts with persons that export certain sensitive technology to Iran..
Item III (FAR Case 2008-016), entitled "Termination for Default Reporting," is a final rule, effective October 29, to establish procedures for contracting officers to provide contractor information, such as terminations for cause or default and defective cost or pricing data, into the Past Performance Information System (PPIRS) and Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) module within PPIRS.
Item IV (FAR Case 2008-008), entitled "Award-Fee Language Revision," is a final rule, effective October 29, adopting, with changes, the interim rule amending the FAR to implement section 814 of the John Warner NDAA for FY 2007 (Pub. L. 109-364), section 867 of the Duncan Hunter NDAA for FY 2009 (Pub. L. 110-417), and the OFPP Policy guidance memorandum dated December 4, 2007, entitled "Appropriate Use of Incentive Contracts."
Item V (FAR Case 2009-020), entitled "Offering a Construction Requirement--8(a) Program," is a final rule effective October 29 which revises FAR subpart 19.8, Contracting with the Small Business Administration (The 8(a) Program), to conform to SBA regulations, by changing the location for submitting offering letters to the SBA for a construction requirement for which a specific offeror is nominated.
Item VI (FAR Case 2009-028), entitled "Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving," is an interim rule amending the FAR to implement Executive Order 13513, issued on October 1, 2009, entitled Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging while Driving, which was issued to demonstrate federal leadership in improving safety on the nation s roads and highways, and to enhance the efficiency of federal contracting by preventing the unsafe practice of text messaging by federal contractors while driving in connection with government business and by promoting economy and efficiency in federal procurement, and by seeking to prohibit the disruption of government business and federal procurement, as a result of unsafe text messaging practices. . Comments are due by November 29. You've got to be kidding me.
Item VII (FAR Case 2009-039), entitled "Buy American Exemption for Commercial Information Technology--Construction Material," is an interim rule amending the FAR to implement section 615 of Division C, Title VI, of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111 117), which authorizes an exemption from the Buy American Act for the acquisition of information technology that is a commercial item.
FAC 2005-47
FAC 2005-47 included the following six items (plus technical amendments):
Item I (FAR Case 2010-006), entitled "Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act," is an interim rule to implement Executive Order 13496 (as previously implemented by the DOL), which requires contractors to display a notice to employees of their rights under Federal labor laws, including (as the DOL has determined) the National Labor Relations Act. Comments are due by February 11, 2011.
Item II (FAR Case 2006-005), entitled "HUBZone Program Revisions," is a final rule effective January 12, 2011, which implements revisions to the SBA's HUBZone Program and requires that (i) for award of a HUBZone contract, a HUBZone small business concern must be a HUBZone small business concern both at the time of its initial offer and at the time of contract award; and (ii) for general construction or construction by special trade contractors, a HUBZone small business concern must spend at least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel on its own employees or subcontract employees of other HUBZone small business concerns. (The 50 percent requirement may be waived in some circumstances.)
Item III (FAR Case 2008-032), entitled "Preventing Abuse of Interagency Contracts," is an interim rule amending FAR subpart 17.5 to implement section 865 of the Duncan Hunter NDAA for FY 2009, by (i) broadening the scope of coverage to address all interagency acquisitions (with limited exceptions), rather than just those conducted under the Economy Act; (ii) requiring agencies to support the decision to use an interagency acquisition with a determination that such action is the "best procurement approach"; (iii) directing that assisted acquisitions be accompanied by written agreements between the requesting agency and the servicing agency documenting the responsibilities of the respective parties, including the planning, execution, and administration of the contract; (iv) requiring the development of business cases (concerning which OMB is developing additional guidance, which will be referenced in the FAR once it is issued) to support the creation of multi-agency contracts; and (v) requiring the senior procurement executive for each executive agency to submit an annual report on interagency acquisitions to the Director of OMB. Comments are due by February 11, 2011.
Item IV (FAR Case 2009-019), entitled "Small Disadvantaged Business Self-Certification," is an interim rule designed to conform the FAR to revisions in the SBA's regulations and to clarify that (i) small disadvantaged business (SDBs) may provide written statements to primes self-certifying their status as SDBs and (ii) primes may rely on these statements in awarding subcontracts to SDBs. Comments are due by February 11, 2011.
Item V (FAR Case 2009-036), entitled "Uniform Suspension and Debarment Requirement," is an interim rule amending the FAR to implement section 815 of the NDAA for FY 2010, which extends the flowdown of the restriction on subcontracting to lower tier subcontractors that have been suspended or debarred, with some exceptions for contracts for the acquisition of commercial items and commercially available off-the-shelf items. Comments are due by February 11, 2011.
Item VI (FAR Case 2008-031), entitled "Limitation on Pass-Through Charges," is a final rule (adopting the prior interim rule with changes), effective January 12, 2011, amending the FAR (i) to implement section 866 of the Duncan Hunter NDAA (NDAA) for FY 2009 (which applies to executive agencies other than DoD) and section 852 of the John Warner NDAA for FY 2007, (which applies to DoD) and (ii) to minimize excessive pass-through charges by contractors from subcontractors, or from tiers of subcontractors, that add no or negligible value, and to ensure that neither a contractor nor a subcontractor receives indirect costs or profit/fee (i.e., pass-through charges) on work performed by a lower-tier subcontractor to which the higher-tier contractor or subcontractor adds no or negligible value.
FAC 2005-48
FAC 2005-48 included the following four items:
Item I (FAR Case 2011-005), entitled "Repeal of the Small Business Competitiveness Demonstration Program," is a final rule effective January 31, 2011, which removes subpart 19.10 of the FAR in order to comply with the requirements of section 1335 of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010.
Item II (FAR Case 2009-027), entitled "Personal Identity Verification of contractor Personnel," is a final rule effective January 31, 2011, which amends the FAR to provide additional regulatory coverage to reinforce the requirement of collecting from contractors all forms of Government-provided identification once they are no longer needed to support a contract.
Item III (FAR Case 2009-031), entitled "Terminating Contracts," is a final rule effective January 31, 2011, which amends the FAR to clarify which procedures for terminating contracts apply to contracts for commercial items.
Item IV (FAR Case 2009-018), entitled "Payrolls and Basic Records," is a final rule adopting the interim rule (with one change) that amends the FAR's "Payrolls and Basic Records" clause in order to implement a Department of Labor rule that protects the privacy of workers.
Other FAR Revisions
A proposed rule would (i) amend the FAR to implement Section 807 of the Ronald W. Reagan NDAA for FY 2005, which requires an adjustment every 5 years of acquisition-related thresholds for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (except for Davis-Bacon Act, Service Contract Act, and trade agreements thresholds) and (ii) use the same methodology to change nonstatutory FAR acquisition-related thresholds for adjustment in 2010.
FAR Case 2009-004 ("Enhancing Contract Transparency"): Comments are sought by July 12 concerning how best to amend the FAR to enable public posting of contract actions, should such posting become a requirement in the future, without compromising contractors proprietary and confidential commercial or financial information.
FAR Case 2009-006 ("Labor Relations Costs"): A proposed rule would amend FAR 31.205-21 to implement Executive Order 13494, Economy in Government Contracting, (issued on January 30, 2009, and amended on October 30, 2009) and to designate as unallowable the costs of any activities undertaken to persuade employees of the recipient of Federal disbursements or of any other entity to exercise or not to exercise, or concerning the manner of exercising, the right to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of the employee s own choosing.
FAR Case 2009-023: a proposed rule would standardize the use of Unique Procurement Instrument Identifiers (PIIDs) throughout the Government and extend the requirement for using PIIDs to all solicitations, contracts, and related procurement instruments.
FAR Case 2009-027 ("Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel"): Another proposed rule would revise the FAR to provide additional regulatory coverage in Subpart 4.13 and in clause 52.204 9 to reinforce the requirement of collecting from contractors all forms of government-provided identification once they are no longer needed to support a contract.
FAR Case 2009-029 ("Clarification of Standard Form 26--Award/Contract") is a proposed rule to amend the FAR to to revise (i) the header for blocks 17 and 18 and (ii) block 18 of the Standard Form 26 to clarify that block 18 should not be used when awarding a negotiated procurement and should only be checked when awarding a sealed-bid contract.
FAR Case 2009-031 ("Terminating Contracts"): A proposed rule would amend the FAR to, inter alia, clarify the FAR 49.502(a) prescription for the "Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed Price) (Short Form)" clause to apprise contracting officers that there are alternative clauses that can be used for terminations up to the simplified acquisition threshold.
FAR Case 2009-034 ("TINA Interest Calculations"): A proposed rule would amend the FAR to revise the clauses at FAR 52.214 27, 52.215 10 and 52.215 11 to require compound interest calculations be applied to Government overpayments as a result of defective cost or pricing data.
FAR Case 2009-038: The FAR Council plans to hold tribal consultation and outreach meetings in October to discuss rulemaking associated with section 811 of the NDAA for FY 2010, Public Law 111-84, which addresses requirements for the justification and approval of sole-source contracts over $20 million under the 8(a) small business development program.
FAR Case 2009-041 (Sudan Waiver Process): A proposed rule would amend FAR section 25.702 (Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Conduct Restricted Business Operations in Sudan) to add specific criteria an agency must address in a waiver request and a waiver consultation process regarding foreign policy aspects of the waiver request for consultations. This information will be provided, in a waiver request, to the President or his appointed designee for consideration of whether the prohibition on awarding a contract to a contractor that conducts business in Sudan should be waived.
FAR Case 2009-043 ("Time-and-Materials (T&M) and Labor-Hour (LH) Contracts for Commercial Items"): This proposed rule would amend the FAR to implement recommendations of GAO Report 09 579 ("Minimal Compliance with New Safeguards for Time-and-Materials Contracts for Commercial Services and Safeguards Have Not Been Applied to GSA Schedules Program").
Department of Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS)
Final Rules
DFARS Case 2008-D046: The DoD converted the interim rule issued July 29, 2009, to a final rule without any changes. The rule amends the DFARS to implement the Dominican Republic Central America United States Free Trade Agreement with respect to Costa Rica, and the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement by waiving the applicability of the Buy American Act for some foreign supplies and construction materials and specify procurement procedures designed to ensure fairness.
DFARS Case 2006-D051: The DoD also converted the interim rule issued January 10, 2008, to final without any changes. The rule implements Section 802 of the NDAA for FY 2008, which places limitations on the award of new contracts for lead system integrator functions in the acquisition of major DoD systems.
DFARS Case 2008-D005: The DoD modified Part 217 of the DFARS by adopting as final, with several changes, the then-current interim rule (i) to address statutory provisions relating to interagency procurements on behalf of DoD, and (ii) to add new policy (a) to cover the requirements of Section 801(b) of the NDAA for FY 2005 regarding the circumstances under which property and services in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold can be acquired through civilian agencies and (b) to expand existing DFARS definitions.
DFARS Case No. 2004-D010: The DoD adopted as final, with changes, an interim rule (i) amending the DFARS (Subpart 204.73) to address contractor responsibilities to comply with existing Department of Commerce and Department of State export control laws and regulations and (ii) prescribing a contract clause (DFARS 252.204-7008) to address those responsibilities.
DFARS Case No. 2006-D053: The DoD adopted as final, without change, an interim rule that requires the Milestone Decision Authority for a major defense acquisition program to select the contract type for a development program that is consistent with the level of program risk in accordance with section 818 of the NDAA for FY 2007.
DFARS Case No. 2008-D002: The DoD adopted as final, with minor changes, an interim rule amending the DFARS to implement sections 886 and 892 of the NDAA for FY 2008, which (i) provide authority for the DoD to limit competition when acquiring products or services in support of operations in Iraq or Afghanistan and (ii) address competition requirements for the procurement of small arms for assistance to Iraq or Afghanistan.
DFARS Case 2008-D032 ("Service Contract Surveillance") is a final rule amending the DFARS to ensure that the requirement for a quality assurance surveillance plan is addressed for each contract with a dollar value above the simplified acquisition threshold, and that contracts for services have appropriate performance management or surveillance plans prepared for the work being performed under the contract.
DFARS Case 2009-D022, entitled "Finland--Public Interest Exception to the Buy American Act," is a final rule issued to reflect a determination by the Secretary of Defense that it is inconsistent with the public interest to apply the restrictions of the Buy American Act to the acquisition of articles, materials, and supplies produced or manufactured in Finland.
DFARS Case 2007-D011, entitled "Letter Contract Definitization Schedule," is a final rule adopting, without changes, a proposed rule amending the DFARS to to clarify requirements regarding definitization of letter contracts and to specify that DoD letter contracts will be definitized using the DFARS procedures applicable to all other undefinitized contract actions.
DFARS Case 2007-D009, entitled "Ground and Flight Risk Clause," is a final rule amending the DFARS to revise and combine contract clauses addressing assumption of risk of loss under contracts that furnish aircraft to the Government so that the requirements will apply consistently to all contract types.
DFARS Case 2010-D016 (Continuation of Contracts--Deletion of Redundant Text): This final rule eliminates the now redundant text of DFARS 209.405 1, which limits the placement of orders against contracts with contractors that have been debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment, because, on December 11, 2003, the final rule published under FAR Case 2002 010 (68 FR 69250) incorporated these restrictions into the FAR.
DFARS Case 2009-D017 (Continuation of Essential Contractor Services): This final rule, adopts, with changes the interim rule amending the DFARS to add policy and a contract clause (DFARS 252.237 7023) requiring that contractors providing essential contractor services, as determined by the requiring activity, shall be prepared to continue such services during periods of crisis.
DFARS Case 2009-D029 (Safety of Facilities, Infrastructure, and Equipment for Military Operations) is an interim rule designed to implement section 807 of the NDAA of 2010, which requires that facilities, infrastructure, and equipment that are intended for use by military or civilian personnel of the DoD, in current or future military operations, should be (i) inspected for safety and habitability prior to use and (ii) brought into compliance with generally accepted standards for the safety and health of personnel to the maximum extent practicable consistent with the requirements of military operations and the best interests of DoD to minimize the safety and health risk posed to such personnel. Comments are due by December 28.
DFARS Case 2009-D040 (Trade Agreements--New Thresholds): This final rule adopts as final (without change) the interim rule that amended the DFARS to incorporate increased thresholds for application of the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement and the Free Trade Agreements, as determined by the United States Trade Representative.
DFARS Case 2009-D041 (Balance of Payments Program Exemption for Commercial Information Technology--Construction Material): This final rule amends the DFARS to implement the exemption from the Balance of Payments Program for construction material that is commercial information technology.
DFARS Case 2008-D024: DoD has adopting as final, with changes, an interim rule amending the DFARS to implement determinations made by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics with regard to the acquisition of items containing para-aramid fibers and yarns manufactured in foreign countries that have entered into a reciprocal defense procurement memorandum of understanding with the United States.
DFARS Case 2009-D010: The DoD has adopted, as final, an interim rule amending the DFARS to add Taiwan as a designated country, due to the accession of Taiwan to membership in the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement.
DFARS Case 2008-D034 (Management of Unpriced Change Orders) is a final rule that adds new policy to address section 812 of the NDAA for FY 2010 by amending the DFARS to make requirements for DoD management and oversight of unpriced change orders consistent with those that apply to other undefinitized contract actions.
DFARS Case 2006-D057 (Excessive Pass-Through Charges) is a final rule to delete the interim DFARS language implementing section 852 of the NDAA for FY 2007 (which requires that pass-through charges on contracts or subcontracts that are entered into for or on behalf of DoD are not excessive in relation to the cost of work performed by the relevant contractor or subcontractor) because the interim language was made obsolete with the publication of the FAR interim rule at 74 FR 52853 on October 14, 2009. Subsequently, a correction was issued because the original publication had incorrectly removed and reserved two C.F.R. sections.
DFARS Case 2009-D024 (Reporting of Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf Items that Contain Specialty Metals--Deletion of Obsolete Clause) is a final rule amending the DFARS to delete the requirement for contractors to report commercially available off-the-shelf items that contain foreign specialty metals and are incorporated into noncommercial end items.
DFARS Case 2008-D011: DoD initially adopted as final (without changes) the interim rule that amended the DFARS to implement sections 805 and 815 of the NDAA for FY 2008 by specifying when time-and-materials or labor-hour contracts may be used for the acquisition of commercial items, and revising the language to address the conditions under which major weapon systems or subsystems may be treated as commercial items. Subsequently, however, DoD delayed confirmation of the interim rule as a final rule to allow consideration of public comments that had been misplaced.
DFARS Case 2003-D028: DoD issued a final rule extensively updating and revising Part 247 ("Transportation") of the DFARS concerning transportation issues under DoD contracts.
DFARS Case 2009-D035 ("Payment of Costs Prior to Definitization--Definition of Contract Action") adopts as final, without change, the interim rule amending Part 217.7401(a) of the DFARS by changing the definition of "contract action" to include task orders and delivery orders.
DFARS Case 2008-D039 ("Government Rights in Design of DoD Vessels") adopts as final, without change, the interim rule amending Parts 227 and 252 of the DFARS to implement section 825 of the Duncan Hunter NDAA for FY 2009 and the Vessel Hull Design Protection Amendments of 2008, which clarifies the Government s rights in technical data in the designs of a DoD vessel, boat, craft, or components thereof.
DFARS Case 2010-D015:
A new DFARS clause 252.203-7003 (entitled "Agency
Office of the Inspector General") has been added,
which reads as follows: "The agency office of the Inspector General
referenced in paragraphs (c) and (d) of FAR clause
52.203 13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and
Conduct, is the DoD Office of the Inspector General at
the following address: DoD Office of the Inspector
General, Investigative Policy and Oversight, 400 Army
Navy Drive, Suite 1037, Arlington, VA 22202 4704,
Toll Free Telephone: 866 429 8011."
DFARS Case 2008-D047:
This final rule
establishes a standard DoD method of specifying
Government-assigned serial numbers contractually and
requires (i) the contractor (a) to associate these
serial numbers with the Unique Item Identifier (UII)
assigned by the contractor and (b) to register them in
the DoD Item Unique Identification (IUID) Registry
along with the UII and (ii) the Government and the
contractor to reach an agreement prior to use of the
serial numbers in constructing the end item UII. DFARS Case 2008-D040: This final rule adopts, with
changes, the prior interim rule that implements
section 884 of the NDAA for FY 2009, which requires DoD to ensure
that, to the maximum extent practicable, in all
carriage contracts in which a fuel-related adjustment
is provided for, any fuel-related adjustment is passed
through to the person who bears the cost of the fuel
to which the adjustment relates. DFARS
Case 2008-D027
(Cost and Software Data Reporting System) is a
final rule to amend the DFARS to address DoD Cost and
Software Data Reporting system requirements for Major
Defense Acquisition Programs and Major Automated
Information Systems. DFARS
Case 2009-D034
(Contract Authority for Advanced Component Development
or Prototype Units) is a final rule (adopting the
prior interim rule with only a minor change) amending
the DFARS to implement section 819 of the NDAA for FY 2010, which
places limitations on certain types of line items and
contract options that may be included in contracts
initially awarded pursuant to competitive
solicitations. DFARS
Case 2010-D025
(Services of Senior Mentors) implements previously
issued DoD memoranda on Senior Mentors (who are
retired DoD personnel that provide training to active
DoD personnel) and has no impact on the general
public. DFARS
Case 2009-D025
(Contractor Insurance/Pension Review) is a final rule
adopting without any changes the proposed rule to
remove and relocate the requirements for conducting a
Contractor Insurance/Pension Review from Procedures,
Guidance, and Information (PGI) to the DFARS. DFARS
Case 2006-D029
(Restriction on Ball and Roller Bearings) is a final
rule amending the DFARS to implement DoD annual
appropriations act requirements and to require
that each ball or roller bearing be manufactured in
the United States, its outlying areas, or Canada, and
that the cost of the bearing components manufactured
in the United States, its outlying areas, or Canada,
exceed 50 percent of the total cost of the bearing
components of that ball or roller bearing. DFARS
Case 2010-D004
(Restrictions on the Use of Mandatory Arbitration
Agreements) is a final rule (adopting a prior interim
rule with changes as a results of comments received
from the public ) which prohibits the use of funds
appropriated or otherwise made available by the DoD
Appropriations Act for FY 2010 for any
contract for noncommercial items (including task or
delivery orders and bilateral modifications adding new
work) in excess of $1 million, if the contractor
restricts its employees to arbitration for claims
under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or
torts related to or arising out of sexual assault or
harassment, including assault and battery, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment,
or negligent hiring, supervision, or retention. DFARS
Case 2009-D015
(Organizational Conflicts of Interest in Major Defense
Acquisition Programs) is a final rule amending the
DFARS to implement
section 207 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform
Act of 2009, which addresses organizational conflicts
of interest in major defense acquisition programs. DFARS
Case 2009-D012
(Foreign Participation in Acquisitions in Support of
Operations in Afghanistan) is a final rule amending
the DFARS (i) to waive section
302(a) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended, which prohibits acquisitions of products or
services from nondesignated countries, in order to
allow acquisition from the nine South Caucasus/Central
and South Asian (SC/CASA) states; and (ii) to
determine the inapplicability of the Balance of
Payments Program evaluation factor to offers of
products (other than arms, ammunition, or war
materials) from the SC/CASA states to support
operations in Afghanistan. The DoD published the updated
charter of the ASBCA as Appendix A, Part 1 of the
DFARS. DFARS Case No.
2008-D023: The DoD promulgated an interim rule adding
several requirements to the DFARS related to the
authority and funding requirements for multiyear
contracts for major weapons systems, in order to
implement section 811 of the
NDAA for FY 2008 and section 8008 of the FY 2007 Defense
Appropriations Act, and the same language in
subsequent DoD appropriations acts. Subsequently, the
DoD issued a final
rule with only minor editorial corrections to the
interim rule. DFARS Case 2009-D017: The DoD
issued an interim rule to add policy and a
contract clause requiring that contractors providing essential
contractor services must be prepared to continue
such services during periods of crisis. DFARS Case 2009-D035:
The DoD issued another interim rule to implement
section 812 of the
NDAA for FY 2010 (Pub.
L. 111 84, enacted October 28, 2009). Section
812 (entitled "Revision of Defense Supplement Relating to Payment of Costs Prior to
Definitization") makes the limitations
on payment of costs prior to definitization of
unpriced change orders applicable to all categories of
undefinitized contractual actions, "including
undefinitized task orders and delivery
orders" and already has been partially
implemented in DFARS Case 2008 D034. The current
case implements the balance of the section by
specifically including the category of "task
orders and delivery orders" in the definition of
"contract action" at DFARS 217.7401. DFARS Case 2009-D014: The DoD
published an interim rule amending the DFARS to
implement the provisions of Section 202 of the Weapons
Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009, entitled
"Acquisition Strategies to Ensure Competition
throughout the Lifecycle of Major Defense Acquisition
Programs," which: (i) requires that
the acquisition strategy for each Major
Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) include
measures to ensure competition at both the prime
contract and subcontract level of the MDAP throughout
its life cycle as a means to improve contractor
performance and adequate documentation of the
rationale for selection of the subcontractor at any
tier; and (ii) requires specified actions to ensure
fair and objective make-buy decisions by
prime contractors on MDAPs and (whenever a decision
regarding the source of repair results in a plan to
award a contract for performance of maintenance and
sustainment of a major weapon system) actions to
ensure that the contract is awarded on a competitive
basis with full consideration of all sources.
Subsequently, the
DoD adopted the interim rule as final with no changes. DFARS Case 2010-D004:
The DoD has issued an interim rule to implement Section 8116 of the FY 2010 DoD
Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 111 118), which
prohibits the use of funds appropriated or otherwise
made available by the Act for any contract (including
task or delivery orders and bilateral modifications
adding new work) in excess of $1 million, if the
contractor restricts its employees to arbitration for
claims under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, or torts related to or arising out of sexual
assault or harassment, including assault and battery,
intentional infliction of emotional distress, false
imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or
retention. The interim rule does not apply to the
acquisition of commercial items, including
commercially available off-the-shelf items. DFARS Case 2009-D040, entitled "Trade
Agreements Thresholds," is an interim rule to
incorporate increased thresholds for application of
the World Trade Organization Government Procurement
Agreement and the Free Trade Agreements, as determined
by the United States Trade Representative. DFARS Case 2009-D034, entitled "Contract
Authority for Advanced Component Development or
Prototype Units," is an interim rule to
implement section 819 of the NDAA for FY 2010, which places
limitations on certain types of line items and
contract options that may be included in contracts
initially awarded pursuant to competitive
solicitations and, in certain circumstances, limits
the dollar value, period of performance, and time for
exercise of such contract line items or contract
options. DFARS Case 2009-D027, entitled "Limitations
on Procurements with Non-Defense Agencies,"
is an interim rule to implement section 806 of the
NDAA for FY 2010 authorizing the placing of contracts for property
and services in excess of the simplified acquisition
threshold by certain non-DoD agencies for the
performance of a joint program conducted to meet the
needs of DoD and the non-DoD agency. DFARS Case 2009-D020 is an interim rule amending the
DFARS to bring DoD into compliance with the OMB's
implementation of the Prompt Payment Act by exempting
military contingencies, and certain payments related
to emergencies and the release or threatened release
of hazardous substances. Comments are due by September
13. DFARS Case 2009-D036
is an interim rule amending the DFARS to
implement section 814 of the NDAA for FY 2010 (Pub. L. 111 84),
which requires agency heads to notify the
congressional defense committees within 30 days after
making any determination to award a task or delivery
order exceeding $100 million to a single source. In
addition, if the task or delivery order concerns DOD
intelligence activities, the agency head also is
required to provide notification within 30 days of the
determination to the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence of the House of Representatives if the
order relates to tactical intelligence and
intelligence related activities, and to the Select
Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the
House of Representatives if the order relates to
intelligence and intelligence-related activities other
than those activities previously mentioned. DFARS Case 2009-D033 is an interim rule amending the
DFARS to implement section 820 of the NDAA for FY 2010, entitled
Publication of Notification of Bundling of
Contracts of the Department of Defense, which
requires DoD contracting officers (i) to publish a
notification consistent with the requirements of FAR
10.001(c)(2) on FedBizOpps.gov, or any successor site,
at least 30 days prior to the release of a
solicitation for a bundled acquisition and (ii) if the
DoD agency has determined that measurably substantial
benefits are expected to be derived as a result of
bundling, to include within the notification a brief
description of those benefits. The acquisitions
covered by section 820 are defined at 820(b) as those
that are funded entirely by DoD funds and covered by
FAR 7.107. DFARS
Case 2009-D039 is an interim rule amending the
DFARS to implement section 823 of the NDAA for FY 2010, which requires
contracting officers to consider reducing or denying
an award fee if actions by a contractor or
subcontractor jeopardize the health or safety of
government personnel. Comments are due by January 11,
2011. DFARS Case 2008-D006 is an
interim rule implementing section 828 of the NDAA for
FY 2008, which
authorizes the Secretary of Defense to enter into a
contract for a period not to exceed 10 years for the
purchase of electricity from sources of renewable
energy. DFARS Case 2010-D010:
DoD issued an interim rule implementing revisions to
DoD Directive-Type Memorandum 09 019, entitled
"Policy Guidance for Foreign Ownership, Control,
or Influence (FOCI)," which revises the
description of communications
security material that is "proscribed
information." DFARS Case 2009-D028
("Guidance on Personal Services") is an
interim rule that revises
DFARS Parts 211 and 237 to enable further
implementation of section 831 of the Duncan Hunter
NDAA for FY 2009, which requires DoD to develop guidance related
to personal services contracts. DFARS Case 2009-D002 (the companion case to FAR Case
2005-040) is an interim rule amending DFARS
219.708 and 252.219 to provide DoD-specific procedures
and policies related to DoD s implementation of the
Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS). DFARS Case 2007-D002
is an interim rule amending the DFARS to implement
section 3504 of the NDAA for FY 2009, which addresses requirements
(e.g., holding either a transportation security card
or a Merchant Mariner's Document and/or passing a
background check) that apply to "riding gang members" (i.e. foreign
nationals who perform work while the ship is underway
beyond standard vessel maintenance and repair)
and other DoD-exempted individuals performing
work on U.S. flag vessels under DoD contracts for
transportation services. DFARS Case 2010-D027 (Prohibition on Interrogation
of Detainees by Contractor Personnel) is an interim
rule to
implement section 1038 of the NDAA for FY 2010 (Pub. L. 111 84),
which prohibits contractor personnel from
interrogating detainees under the control of the
Department of Defense, but also allows the Secretary
of Defense to waive the prohibition for a limited
period of time, if determined necessary to the
national security interests of the United States. DFARS
Case 2009-D011 (Annual Representations and
Certifications) is a proposed rule to amend the DFARS
to conform to FAR requirements concerning Annual Reps
and Certs. Comments are due by January 24, 2011. DFARS
Case 2010-D013 (Discussions Prior to contract
Award) is a proposed rule (recommended by the
DoD Source Selection Joint Analysis Team) to strongly
encourage discussions prior to award for source
selections of procurements estimated at $100 million
or more. Comments are due by January 24. DFARS
Case 2009-D038
(Business Systems--Definition and Administration) is
an lengthy, extensive set of proposed changes to the
DFARS designed to improve the effectiveness of DoD
oversight of contractor business systems, and, after
receiving 370 comments on the original proposed rules,
the DoD has published revised proposed rules. Comments
on the latest proposals are due by January 3, 2011. DFARS
Case 2009-D008 (Government
Property) is a proposed rule to revise
DFARS part 245, Government Property,
to reflect recent revisions to FAR part 45, Government
Property. DFARS Case 2009-D025: DoD
proposed to relocate the requirements for conducting a
Contractor
Insurance/Pension Review from Procedures,
Guidance, and Information to the DFARS. DFARS Case 2009-D041,
entitled "Balance
of Payments Program Exemption for Commercial
Information Technology," is a proposed rule
that would amend the DFARS to
implement the exemption from the Balance of Payments
Program for construction material that is commercial
information technology. DFARS Case 2008-D047
("Government-Assigned Serial Number
Marking") is a proposed rule which would require
contractors to apply government-assigned
serial numbers in human readable format on major
end items, when required by law, regulation, or
military operational necessity. DFARS Case 2008-D049
("Reporting of Government Property Lost, Stolen,
Damaged, or Destroyed") is a proposed rule to
amend the DFARS to require contractors to report loss,
theft, damage, and destruction government property to the
DCMA "eTools" application. DFARS Case 2006-D021
("Award Fee Contracts") is a proposed rule
to amend the DFARS to address award-fee
contracts, including eliminating the use of
provisional award-fee payments. DFARS Case 2009-D012: The DoD proposed to amend the
DFARS to implement (i) the July 9, 2009 waiver (issued
by the Deputy Secretary of Defense) of the section
302(a) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(which generally prohibits acquisitions of products or
services from nondesignated countries) in order to
allow acquisition from the nine South Caucasus/Central
and South Asian (SC/CASA) states; and (ii) the Deputy
Secretary's determination of inapplicability of the
Balance of Payments Program evaluation factor to
offers of products (other than arms, ammunition, or
war materials) from those SC/CASA states to support
operations in Afghanistan. Subsequently, on December
29, this rule became final. DFARS Case No. 2009-D038 (Business Systems--Definition and
Administration): DoD proposed to amend the DFARS to
improve the effectiveness of DoD oversight of
contractor business systems by (i) defining contractor
business systems as accounting systems, estimating
systems, purchasing systems, earned value management
systems (EVMS), material management and accounting
systems (MMAS), and property management systems, and
(ii) implementing a business systems clause which
includes payment withholding that allows
administrative contracting officers to withhold a
percentage of payments, under certain conditions, when
a contractor s business system contains
deficiencies, including (a) interim payments under cost
reimbursement contracts, incentive type contracts,
time-and-materials contracts, or labor-hour contracts;
(b) progress payments; or (c) performance-based payments. DFARS Case 2009-D003: DoD
proposed (i) to amend the DFARS to implement Section
807 of the Ronald W. Reagan NDAA for FY 2005 (which provides
for adjustment every 5 years of statutory
acquisition-related thresholds) and (ii) to review
nonstatutory acquisition thresholds. DFARS Case No.
2009-D004: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS to
address requirements for minimizing the use of hexavalent
chromium in defense weapon systems, subsystems,
components, and other items by prohibiting the
delivery of items containing hexavalent chromium under
DoD contracts unless an exception applies. DFARS Case No. 2009-D015: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS to implement
section 207 of the Weapons Systems Acquisition Reform
Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111 23), which requires DoD
to revise the DFARS to provide uniform guidance and
tighten existing requirements for organizational
conflicts of interest (OCIs) by contractors in
major defense acquisition programs. Subsequently, on
December 29, the final rule was published. DFARS Case 2008-D042
("Preservation of Tooling for Major Defense
Acquisition Programs") would amend the DFARS to
implement section 815 of the Duncan Hunter NDAA for FY 2009, which
requires acquisition plans for major weapons systems
to include a plan for the preservation and storage of special
tooling associated with the production of hardware
for major defense acquisition programs through the end
of the service life of the related weapons system. DFARS Case 2008-D050
("Marking of Government-Furnished Property")
would require contractors to tag,
label, or mark items of government-furnished
property identified in the contract when the
government-furnished material and government-furnished
property are subject to serialized item management. DFARS Case 2007-D003 ("Presumption
of Development at Private Expense") would
amend the DFARS to implement section 802(b)
of the NDAA (NDAA) for
FY (FY) 2007 and section 815(a)(2) of the
NDAA for FY 2008 by establishing special requirements
and procedures related to the validation of a
contractor s or subcontractor s asserted
restrictions on technical data and computer software. DFARS Case 2008-D027 ("Cost
and Software Data Reporting System") would
add a new subpart 234.71 to the DFARS to set
forth DoD Cost and Software Data Reporting system
requirements for major defense acquisition programs
and major automated information system programs. DFARS Case 2006-D029 ("Restriction
on Ball and Roller Bearings") would amend the
DFARS to revise the domestic source
restriction on acquisition of ball and roller bearings
from the current rule (which requires that the
bearings and the main bearing components be
manufactured in the U.S. or Canada and is based on 10
U.S.C. 2534(a)(5), which expired on October 1, 2005)
to a rule that interprets the annual defense
appropriations act domestic source restriction on the
acquisition of these items in a manner similar to the
domestic source restriction of the Buy American Act. DFARS Case 2009-D018 ("Warranty Tracking of
Serialized Items") is a proposed rule to amend
the DFARS to implement a policy memorandum of the
Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology,
and Logistics dated February 6, 2007, that required
definition of the requirements to track warranties for
items subject to Item Unique Identification in the
Item Unique Identification registry as an aid to
enforcement of warranties, which is essential to the
effectiveness of DoD s material readiness. DFARS Case 2009-D023
is a proposed rule to amend DFARS Appendix F (Material Inspection
and Receiving Report) to incorporate procedures for
using the electronic Wide Area Workflow Receiving
Report required for use in most contracts in lieu of
the DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving
Report. DFARS Case 2010-D001 ("Patents, Data, and
Copyrights") is a proposed rule to update text on
patents, data, and copyrights in order to (i) remove
text and clauses that are obsolete or unnecessary;
(ii) relocate and integrate the coverage for computer
software and computer software documentation with the
coverage for technical data to eliminate redundant
coverage for these subjects; (iii) eliminate or
combine the clauses associated with technical data and
computer software, consistent with the revised and
streamlined regulatory coverage; (iv) relocate,
reorganize, and clarify the coverage for rights in
works; and (iv) relocate to the DFARS companion
resource, Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI),
text that is not regulatory in nature and does not
impact the public.
DFARS Case 2009-D037: DoD
proposed to amend the DFARS to to make electronic
distribution procedures a routine part of order
issuance by adding a new "Ordering"
clause (and associated prescription) to establish
a standard method for issuing orders via electronic
means. DoD proposed to update
current policies and procedures to reflect the
DoD FOIA Program as prescribed by Executive Order
13392 in order to ensure appropriate
agency disclosure of information and offer consistency
with the goals of 5 U.S.C. 552. DFARS
Case 2009-D011
(Annual Representations and Certifications) is a
proposed rule to amend the DFARS to conform to FAR
requirements concerning Annual Reps and Certs.
Comments are due by January 24, 2011. DFARS
Case 2010-D013
(Discussions Prior to contract Award): A a proposed
rule (recommended
by the DoD Source Selection Joint Analysis Team) would
strongly encourage discussions prior to award for
source selections of procurements estimated at $100
million or more. Comments are due by January 24. DFARS
Case 2010-D023 (Definition
of Sexual Assault): A proposed would would amend the
DFARS to ensure that contractor employees who are
authorized to accompany U.S. Armed Forces deployed
outside the United States are
aware (i) of the DoD definition of sexual
assault as defined in DoD Directive 6495.01,
Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) Program
and (ii) that such offenses are covered under the
Uniform Code of Military Justice. DFARS
Case 2009-D043
(Reporting of Government-Furnished Property): A proposed rule
would amend the DFARS (i) to
revise and expand reporting requirements for
government-furnished property to include items
uniquely and nonuniquely identified and (ii) to
clarify policy for contractor access to government
supply sources. The Army Corps of
Engineers proposed an interim "Continuing
Contracts" funding clause for use only on
specially designated civil works projects, which is designed (i) to provide options
for funding contracts spanning more than one FY after the enactment of statutory restrictions to
the Corps continuing contract authority and (ii) to
allow Congress more oversight over continuing
contracts and better control over the rate at which
funds are spent on projects so that contracts will
obligate funds in close alignment with prerogatives
reflected in budget documents and appropriations acts. The Bureau of Industry
and Security (BIS) issued corrections
to a previously published final rule affecting Export
Control Classification Numbers 1A004 and 5A001. T The BIS also published a final rule to amend
the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to
implement the understandings
reached at the September 2009 plenary meeting of the
Australia Group (AG) and to implement a decision
recommended at the 2009 AG Plenary, specifically (i)
to add technical notes to the AG Control List of Dual-Use Chemical
Manufacturing Facilities and Equipment and Related
Technology and Software in order to
clarify (a) the term "alloys," as used in
reference to the types of materials from which such
equipment is made and (b) "nominal size,"
as used in reference to the valves described on this
AG control list and (ii) to amend the EAR to reflect
the AG decision to remove "white pox"
virus from the AG List of Biological Agents for Export
Control. The BIS amended the EAR to reflect
changes to the Missile
Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Annex that were
agreed to by MTCR member countries at the November
2009 Plenary in Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, including clarifying the meaning of
the term "production facilities." The BIS
made extensive changes to the EAR as a result of its
comprehensive review of the CCL. The BIS issued a final
rule that (i) updates and clarifies export and
reexport license requirements on striking weapons,
restraint devices, shotguns and parts, optical
sighting devices, and electric shock devices and (ii)
adds equipment designed for the execution of humans to
the CCL. The BIS revised the CCL to implement
changes made to the Wassenaar
Arrangement s List of Dual Use Goods and
Technologies (Wassenaar List) maintained and
agreed to by governments participating in the
Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for
Conventional Arms and Dual Use Goods and Technologies
at the December 2009 WA Plenary Meeting (the Plenary).
Specifically, the new rule revises the EAR by amending
certain entries that are controlled for national
security reasons in Categories 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Part I
(telecommunications), 6, 7, and 9, revising reporting
requirements, and adding, removing and amending EAR
Definitions. The changes agreed to at the Plenary that
pertain to Export Control Classification Numbers
(ECCNs) 5A002, 5D002, 6A002, 6A003, 8A002 and all
related ECCNs will be implemented in a separate rule.
Moreover, the changes agreed to at the Plenary that
pertain to raising the Adjusted Peak Performance (APP)
for digital computers in ECCN 4A003 will be
implemented in another separate rule when the
President s report for High Performance Computers
has been sent to Congress that sets forth the new APP
in accordance with the NDAA for FY1998. The
BIS amended the EAR to implement changes to
the Entity
List on the basis of the annual review of that
list conducted by the End-User Review Committee.
Specifically, the rule removed five entities from the
Entity List under Russia and made twenty-one
modifications to the Entity List (consisting of
modifications to eighteen Chinese entries and three
Russian entries currently on the Entity List) by
adding additional addresses, aliases and/or clarifying
the names for these twenty-one entities. The BIS proposed various changes
to the DPAS
regulations. The BIS also proposed to amend the
EAR by adding ECCN 6A981 to the CCL to control passive
infrasound sensors because of their military and
commercial utility. Items under this new ECCN will be
controlled for Regional Stability (RS) and
Anti-Terrorism (AT) reasons. In addition, BIS proposes
to control technology and software for the
development, production, or use of these items for RS
and AT reasons under revised ECCNs 6D991 and 6E991,
respectively. The
BIS proposed an extensive set of changes to the CCL by
adding a new exception (Strategic
Trade Authorization or "STA") to the
EAR, which would allow exports, reexports and
transfers (in-country) of specified items to
destinations that pose little risk of unauthorized use
of those items so long as notification, destination
control statement and consignee statement requirements
were met. The
BIS also requested comments concerning how the CCL
could be more clear, positive, and tiered, including
comments on the degree to which a controlled
item provides the United States with a critical,
substantial, or significant military or intelligence
advantage and the availability of the item outside
certain groups of countries. The Commerce Department updated
the entire Commerce
Acquisition Regulation supplement to bring it in
line with the FAR. Effective
December 23, DoD is
waiving the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 2354 for the
following defense items produced in the United Kingdom
(which will permit procurement from sources in the
United Kingdom): (i) air circuit breakers; (ii) welded
shipboard anchor and mooring chain with a diameter of
four inches or less; (iii) gyrocompasses; (iv)
electronic navigation chart systems; (v) steering
controls; (vi) pumps; (vii) propulsion and
machinery control systems; and (viii) totally enclosed
lifeboats. Civilian Personnel Per Diem
Bulletin 266 includes revised non-foreign
overseas per diem rates for travel in Alaska,
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and
Possessions of the United States. Civilian Personnel Per Diem
Bulletin 267, 270,
and 272
list further revisions. In accordance with 10 U.S.C.
2330a as amended by section 807 of the NDAA for FY 2008,
the Defense
Threat Reduction Agency will make available to the
public (at this
website) the first inventory of activities
performed pursuant to contracts for services . DoD proposed
revisions to the FAR 52.219-7 class
deviation regarding partial small business
set-asides for DLA DESC bulk fuel solicitations in
order to, inter alia, clarify that a small
business will not be awarded a set-aside portion at a
price higher than its offer price under the
non-set-aside portion. DoD
issued an interim final rule amending 32 C.F.R.
Part 241 to implement section
1110 of the NDAA for
FY 2010, which authorizes DoD to establish a Pilot
Program for the Temporary Exchange of Information
Technology (IT) Personnel under which there may be
temporary assignments of DoD IT employees to private
sector organizations and vice versa. The Department of Education proposed to reissue its acquisition
regulation (the "EDAR") to update it to
comply with current FAR and Education Department
policies and requirements. The DOT proposed to improve
administration of the Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise Program by increasing
accountability for recipients with respect to good
faith efforts to meet overall goals, modifying and
updating certification requirements, adjusting the
personal net worth threshold for inflation, providing
for expedited interstate certification, and adding
provisions to foster small business participation and
improve post-award oversight. The DOE amended the DOE
Acquisition Regulation (DEAR)
Subchapters E (General Contracting
Requirements), F (Special Categories of Contracting),
and G (Contract Management), to (i) conform to the
FAR, (ii) remove out-of-date coverage, and (iii)
update references. The DOE amended the DEAR to
implement E. O. 13514, (Federal Leadership in
Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance) to
utilize agency acquisitions to foster markets for sustainable
technologies and energy efficient and
environmentally sustainable materials, products, and
services. The DOE amended Subchapter I of the DEAR at 48 C.F.R. Part
970 (concerning Management
and Operating Contracts) to conform it to the FAR.
Effective
December 10, the DOE is amending sections of the DEAR
related to socioeconomic
programs to conform them to the FAR. to remove
outdated coverage, and to update references. The DOE proposed to amend the
DEAR to (i) revise the applicability and the policies
and procedures involving the access
to and ownership of records; (ii) to amend various
contract clauses for consistent inclusion in all
applicable contracts (not just M&O contracts)
based on the type of work being performed, to ensure
preservation and Government ownership of records; and
(iii) to address inconsistencies relating to DOE
contractor and subcontractor efforts in managing
records in accordance with DOE retention requirements. The DOE also proposed to amend
the DEAR on Management
and Operating Contracts to make changes to conform
to the FAR, remove out-of-date coverage, and update
references. GSAR Case 2008-G503: The GSA
revised Part
505 of the GSAR, entitled "Publicizing
Contract Actions." GSAR Case 2008-G504: The GSA
revised Part
512 of the GSAR regarding the "Acquisition of
Commercial Items." GSAR Case 2006-G504: The GSA
revised Part
516 ("Types of Contracts") of the GSAR
to clarify the requirements for use of each type of
contract. GSAR Case 2008-G511:
The GSA amended GSAR Part
541 (Acquisition of Utility Services) by adding two
clauses specific to utility services: the
"Availability of Funds" clause, which replaces the corresponding FAR
clause, and the "Disputes" clause, which
supplements the FAR clause. FTR Bulletin 10-02: The GSA
published a revised Standard
Mileage Rate for moves within the continental
United States, reducing the prior rate of 24 cents per
mile to 16.5 cents. The revised rate is effective for
travel during calendar year 2010. The GSA also
published Per
Diem Bulletin 11-01 updating per diem travels
rates for CONUS for fiscal 2011. FTR
Bulletin 11-02: The GSA updated the Fly America
Act information on the GSA web site with recent
changes to the US EU Open Skies agreement. FTR
Bulletin 11-03 established the privately-owned vehicle
mileage
reimbursement rates for calendar year 2011. FTR Case 2010-302: The GSA amended the FTR by (i) adding new terms and
definitions for "official travel" and
"transit system"; (ii) clarifying
reimbursement for transportation at an official
station while en route to and/or from an authorized
TDY location; (iii) clarifying reimbursement for
transportation expenses within the surrounding area of
a TDY location and provisions for payment under the
FTR; and (iv) specifying when the government
contractor-issued travel charge card must be used
while on official travel. FTR Case 2010-303: This interim rule amended the FTR by (i) adding
terms and definitions for "Dependent,"
"Domestic partner," and "Domestic
partnership," and (ii) revising the definition of
"Immediate family" to include "Domestic
partner" and children, dependent parents, and
dependent brothers and sisters of the Domestic partner
as named members of the employee s household, and
(iii) adding references to domestic partners and
committed relationships, where applicable, in the FTR. FTR Case 2010-305: This final rule amended the FTR
by (i) updating statutory references in a number of
sections, (ii) providing additional guidance for
determining distance measurements when traveling by
privately owned aircraft, (iii) clarifying provisions
regarding the use of personally owned vehicles for
official travel, (iv) updating the addresses to which
per diem review requests should be sent, and (v)
changing the method by which agencies must report the
use of government aircraft to carry senior federal
officials and non-federal travelers. FTR Case 2010-306:
The GSA revised the FTR by
(i) removing section 301 50.8, which contains
language regarding limitations on travel arrangements
for common carriers, commercial lodging, and car
rental usage; (ii) revising (a) section 301 10.105
regarding the basic requirements for using common
carrier transportation and (b) section 301 10.450 to
provide guidance to travelers regarding renting
vehicles under the Defense Travel Management Office s
(DTMO) U.S. Government Car Rental Agreement; (iii)
revising section 301 11.11 to provide guidance to
travelers who choose to obtain commercial lodging
under a government lodging agreement; and (iv)
updating references in
section 301 73.106 and Appendix D to Chapter 301 to
change "Surface Deployment Distribution
Command" (SDDC) to "Defense Travel
Management Office" (DTMO). For official travel performed on
or after January 1, 2010, the GSA's FTR per-mile
reimbursement rates for official travel on
privately-owned vehicles are as follows:
privately-owned automobiles ($.50); motorcycles
($.47); airplanes ($1.29). FMR Case
2010-102-2: The GSA amended the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) by
updating its coverage on transportation
management. The GSA issued a proposed rule
revising Part 102-38 of the Federal Management
Regulation (FMR) by amending the provisions for the
sale of personal property through Federal
Asset Sales (FAS) Sales Centers. The GAO issued the March 10,
2010, update of the third edition of Principles
of Federal Appropriations Law. The DHS adopted the
amendments to its Homeland Security Acquisition
Regulation that were issued under an interim rule on
August 17, 2009, as final, without change, to
implement a statute limiting the acquisition of
products containing textiles
from sources outside the United States. HSAR
Case 2009-002 is a lengthy set of proposed changes
to DHS' acquisition regulation (the "HSAR"),
48 C.F.R. Parts 3001-3053, to
align existing content with the FAR; to implement
Section 695 of the Post-Katrina Emergency Management
Reform Act of 2006; to clarify agency acquisition
regulations; to provide editorial corrections; and to
comply with the statutory change restricting the
length of certain noncompetitive contracts entered
into by DHS to facilitate the response to or recovery
from a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other
manmade disaster. HSAR Case 2009-003 ("Lead System
Integrators") is an interim rule amending the
HSAR to implement section 6405 of the U.S. Troop
Readiness, Veterans Care, Katrina Recovery, and
Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007, which
restricts contractors from acting as lead system
integrators in the acquisition of DHS major systems if
they have direct financial interests in the
development or construction of any individual system
or element of any system of systems they integrate
(subject to stated exceptions). HSAR Case 2009-005, entitled
"Limitations on Subcontracting in Emergency
Acquisitions," is a proposed rule to implement a
statutory requirement limiting the use of subcontractors
on cost-reimbursement type contracts entered into
by the Department to facilitate the response to or
recovery from a natural disaster or act of terrorism
or other man-made disaster. The Federal Housing Finance
Agency issued final rules implementing the EAJA
for eligible prevailing parties in adjudications
against it. The Department of the Interior
issued an interim final rule making various administrative
changes to its acquisition regulation to harmonize
it with the FAR and to make other corrections.
Subsequently, the agency adopted the rule as final. Effective July 6, the Bureau of
Indian Affairs in the Interior Department and the
Indian Health Service in HHS made belated
technical amendments to their joint regulations
governing contracts and annual funding agreements
under the Indian
Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to
reflect, among other things, the dissolution of the
Interior Board of Contract Appeals in favor of the
CBCA. The DOL issued a proposed rule
which, in its final form, will implement Executive
Order 13495 regarding the nondisplacement
of qualified workers on service contracts. The Bureau of International
Labor Affairs updated
the list required by Executive Order No. 13126,
entitled "Prohibition of Acquisition of Products
Produced by Forced or Indentured Child
Labor," in accordance with the
"Procedural Guidelines for the Maintenance of the
List of Products Requiring Federal Contractor
Certification as to Forced or Indentured Child
Labor," to set forth the latest list of products,
by country of origin, which the Departments of Labor,
State and Homeland Security have a reasonable basis to
believe might have been mined, produced, or
manufactured by forced or indentured child labor.
Federal contractors who supply products on this list
are required to certify, among other things, that they
have made a good faith effort to determine whether
forced or indentured child labor was used to produce
the item. The Information Security
Oversight Office amended National Industrial Security
Program Directive No. 1 to provide guidance to
agencies concerning the release of certain classified
information (specifically, "proscribed
information") to contractors that are owned or
under the control of a foreign interest and have had
the foreign ownership or control mitigated by a
Special Security Agreement. The same office published a
Directive as a final rule implementing E.O. 13526
regarding classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying
national
security information. The Deputy Assistant Secretary
of the Navy, Acquisition and Logistics
Management, solicited comments that the
Department of the Navy may use in drafting a policy
that will establish a Preferred
Supplier Program (PSP) under which contractors
that have demonstrated exemplary performance, at the
corporate level, in the areas of cost, schedule,
performance, quality, and business relations would be
granted Preferred Supplier Status and would, thereby,
receive more favorable contract terms and conditions
in DON contracts. However, the Navy subsequently withdrew
this notice regarding the PSP. OMB solicited public comments on
the advisability of adopting the Economic
Classification Policy Committee s recommendations
for NAICS
updates for 2012. In response to the March 4, 2009
Presidential
Memorandum on Government Contracting, the OMB's
OFPP issued a proposed
policy letter clarify the circumstances when work
must be reserved for performance by federal government
employees consistent with section 321 of the NDAA for FY 2009, which requires
OMB to (i) create a single definition for the term
"inherently governmental function" that
addresses any deficiencies in the existing definitions
and reasonably applies to all agencies; (ii) establish
criteria to be used by agencies to identify
"critical" functions and positions that
should only be performed by federal employees; and
(iii) provide guidance to improve internal agency
management of functions that are inherently
governmental or critical. The OFPP's CAS Board
proposed to harmonize CAS
412 and 413 with the Pension Protection Act (PPA)
of 2006 (which amended the minimum funding
requirements for defined benefit pension plans and
required the Board to harmonize with PPA the CAS
applicable to the government reimbursement of the
contractor s pension costs) by, inter alia,
recognizing a "minimum actuGeorgia liability"
consistent with the PPA minimum required contribution,
which should lessen the difference between the amount
of pension cost reimbursable to the contractor in
accordance with CAS and the amount of pension
contribution required to be made by the contractor as
the plan sponsor by PPA. The OFPP also proposed to amend 48
C.F.R. Part 9903 to eliminate an exemption from
the Cost Accounting Standards for contracts executed
and performed entirely outside the United States, its
territories, and possessions. Comments are due by
December 20. The SBA issued a final rule to
permanently adopt the current temporary size standard
implemented under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act that is now in effect through
September 30, 2010 for the Surety
Bond Guarantee Program, which provides that a
business concern is small if such concern, combined
with its affiliates, does not exceed the size standard
for the NAICS code that corresponds to the primary
industry of the business concern combined with its
affiliates. As part of a comprehensive
review that will eventually cover all its size
standard categories, the SBA published final rules
revising (generally increasing, often significantly)
its size standards in multiple categories within each
of three NAICS sector groups: 44-45
(Retail Trade); 72
(Accommodations and Food Services); and 81
(Other Services). The SBA made extensive
amendments to 13 C.F.R. Part 127, currently entitled Women-Owned
Small Business Federal Contract Assistance Procedures,
(as well as other SBA regulations affected by these
changes) in order to implement procedures authorized
by the Small Business Act (Pub. L. 85 536, as
amended) to help ensure a level playing field on which
Women-Owned Small Businesses can compete for federal
contracting opportunities. As revised, Part 127 will
be entitled "Women-Owned Small Business Federal
Contract Program." The SBA also announced the
availability of a compliance
guide for the Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB)
Program, which sets forth in plain language the
requirements for participation in the WOSB program and
is intended to help small businesses understand the
regulation and how it affects them. The guide is
available here. The SBA granted a class
waiver of the nonmanufacturer rule for Configured
Tape Library Storage Equipment, Product Service Code
(PSC) 7025 Automated Data Processing (ADP)
Input/Output and Storage Devices, PSC 7035 ADP Support
Equipment, and PSC 7045 ADP Supplies, under the North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code
334112 (Computer Storage Device Manufacturing). The SBA granted a class waiver of the
Nonmanufacturer Rule for Not-Portable, Liquid
Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (CS MS) Systems,
High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Systems,
Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC MS)
Systems, and, Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometry (ICP MS) Systems under Product Service
Code (PSC) 6640 (Laboratory Equipment and Supplies),
under North American Industry Classification System
(NAICS) code 334516
(Analytical Laboratory Instrument Manufacturing). The SBA granted a class waiver of the Nonmanufacturer Rule
for Woven and Knit Impregnated with Flat Dipped
Rubber/Plastic Gloves, under NAICS code 315992
(Glove and Mitten Manufacturing). The SBA proposed numerous
amendments to its small business size regulations
to (i) clarify the effect, across all small business
programs, of initial and appeal eligibility decisions
on the procurement in question; (ii) increase the
amount of time that SBA has to render formal size
determinations; (iii) require that SBA s Office of
Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issue a size appeal
decision within 60 calendar days of the close of the
record, if possible; (iv) increase the amount of time
that SBA has to file North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code appeals; (v) alter
the NAICS code appeal procedures to comply with a
federal court decision; (vi) clarify that contracting
officers must reflect final agency eligibility
decisions in federal procurement databases and goal
statistics; (vii) clarify how a contracting officer
assigns a NAICS code and size standard to a multiple
award procurement; and (viii) make other changes to
size status protest and appeal rules. The proposed
rule changes would affect 13 C.F.R. Parts 121, 124,
125, 126, and 134. The SBA also proposed
changes to 13 C.F.R. Part 127 (entitled "Women-Owned
Small Business Federal Contract Assistance
Procedures"), including eliminating the
requirement for an agency-by-agency determination of
discrimination, adopting both numbers and
dollars measures
of under-representation, and using the FY 2006 CCR database as the data source for determining
eligible industries under the WOSB Program. The SBA proposed to waive the
nonmanufacturer rule for herbicides,
insecticides, and fungicides, under PSC 6840,
under NAICS code 325120. Subsequently, the SBA decided
to
grant the waiver, effective July 29. The SBA considered
granting a class waiver of the nonmanufacturer rule
for Optical Instrument and Lens Manufacturing,
specifically GEN II and GEN III Image Intensifier
Tubes, Product Service Code (PSC) 5855, and Night
Vision Equipment, Emitted and Reflected Radiation,
under NAICS
code 333314 (Optical Instrument and Lens
Manufacturing). The agency decided not
to issue a class waiver for Improved
Outer Tactical Vests and related accessories under
Product Service Code (PSC) 8470 (Armor Personal) under
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
code 339113 (Surgical Appliance and Supplies
Manufacturing). The State Department's Bureau of
Verification, Compliance, and Implementation published
a list of foreign persons and firms banned from
selling to the Government, receiving FMS items or
services, or obtaining items on the Munitions Control
List because of violations involving the Iran,
North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act. The agency amended the ITAR to
require electronic
submission of a request for a commodity
jurisdiction determination using "Commodity
Jurisdiction (CJ) Determination Form" (Form DS 4076). The Department amended the ITAR
to clarify that an exemption
for technical data includes technical data,
regardless of media or format, sent or taken by a U.S.
person who is an employee of a U.S. corporation or a
U.S. Government agency to a U.S. person employed by
that U.S. corporation or to a U.S. Government agency
outside the United States. The State Department proposed to
amend the ITAR to relax requirements placed on
end-users to include information concerning employment
of dual-nationals
and third-country nationals in export licenses. The agency also proposed to
amend the ITAR
by removing the requirement for prior approval or
prior notification before proposals for foreign
sales of significant military equipment or defense
services to foreign persons may be made. Subsequently,
the agency did, in fact, make this amendment. As
part of the President s export control reform
initiative, the State Department's Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls (i) solicited public comments
on revisions to the United States Munitions List that
would make it a "positive
list" of controlled defense articles (i.e.,
a list that describes controlled items using objective
criteria rather than broad, open-ended, subjective, or
design intent-based criteria), and (ii) requested that
the public (a) "tier" defense articles based
on the Administration s three-tier control criteria
and (b) identify those current defense articles that
the public believes do not fall within the scope of
any of the criteria s tiers. The
State Department also proposed to revise Category
VII (tanks and military vehicles) of the Munitions
List in the ITAR (22 C.F.R. Part 121) to provide more
accurate descriptions of the products included in that
category. For the period July 1 through
December 31, 2010 the Prompt
Payment Act interest rate is 3 1/8%. The
interest
rate will be 2 5/8% for the period January 1
through June 30, 2011. The Department of Agriculture
proposed (i) to amend the Guidelines
for Designating Biobased Products for Federal
Procurement to designate the following items
within which biobased products would be afforded
Federal procurement preference: disposable tableware;
expanded polystyrene foam recycling products; heat
transfer fluids; ink removers and cleaners; mulch and
compost materials; multipurpose lubricants; office
paper; topical pain relief products; and turbine drip
oils; and (ii) to establish minimum required biobased
contents for each of these items. The VA adopted as final, without
changes, an
interim final rule that implements portions of the
Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information
Technology Act of 2006, which requires the VA to verify
ownership and control of veteran-owned small
businesses, including service-disabled veteran-owned
small businesses. The final rule defines the
eligibility requirements for businesses to obtain
verified status, explains examination
procedures, and establishes records retention and
review processes. In the same document, the VA also
has implemented new interim final requirements, that
eligible owners work full-time in the business for
which they have applied for acceptance in the
Verification Program, changes the time period for
issuance of reconsideration decisions from 30 to 60
days, and changes the distribution of profits for
limited liability companies and employee stock
ownership plans and solicits comments on these
regulatory amendments only.
Interim Rules
Proposed
Rules
Other Agencies
Army
Bureau of
Industry and Security
Commerce Department
Defense Department
Department of Education
Department of
Transportation
Energy Department
General
Services Administration (GSA)
Government
Accountability Office (GAO)
Homeland Security
Housing and Urban
Development
Interior
Labor Department
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA)
Navy Department
Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Office
of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP)
Small
Business Administration (SBA)
State Department
Treasury Department
United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Veterans Affairs