Contents
Statutes
National Defense
Authorization Act, 2015
Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2015
Executive Orders
and Related Publications
Executive
Order 13706 requires the Government to promulgate
regulations requiring federal contractors and
subcontractors to provide paid sick leave to
employees.
Regulations
Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR)
Federal
Acquisition Circulars (FAC)
FAC
2005-80
FAC
2005-80 included the following two
items (plus technical amendments):
FAR
Case 2013-001: A final rule amended the
FAR to strengthen protections against trafficking in persons in
federal contracts as required by Executive Order 13627 and title
XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.
FAR
Case 2014-008: A final rule amended
the FAR to strengthen guidance on service acquisitions
involving uncompensated overtime. Specifically, the existing definitions of
"uncompensated overtime" and "uncompensated overtime
rate" at FAR 52.237–10(a) have been incorporated at FAR 37.101, with the defined term
"uncompensated overtime rate" changing to
"adjusted hourly rate (including uncompensated
overtime)," whose definition, in turn, clarifies that the proposed hours per week include
uncompensated overtime hours over and above the standard 40-hour work
week. The clause at FAR 52.237–10 is further amended to clarify the
application of the adjusted hourly rate, and categorization of proposed hours
subject to the adjusted hourly rate.
FAC 2005-81
FAC
2005-81 included the following item:
FAR Case 2015-013: An interim rule amended the FAR to
implement both (i) Executive Order (E.O.) 13672, "Further
Amendments to Executive Order 11478, Equal Employment
Opportunity in the Federal Government, and Executive Order
11246, Equal Employment Opportunity," and (ii) a
final rule
previously issued by the DOL, which substituted the
phrase "sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or
national origin" for "sex or national origin" in the
applicable regulations requiring affirmative measures
by federal contractors and subcontractors to prevent
discrimination on any of the prohibited bases.
FAC
2005-82
FAC
2005-82 included the following
three items, plus technical amendments:
FAR Case 2014-013: A final rule adopted, without
change, the prior interim rule amending the FAR to
implement rules issued by the DOL's OFCCP relating to
equal opportunity and affirmative action for veterans and
individuals with disabilities.
FAR Case 2013-012: A final rule
amended the FAR to implement section 802 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2013,
which provides additional requirements relative to the
review of, and justification for, pass-through contracts.
FAR Case 2014-010: A final rule
amended the FAR to accommodate the recent merger of the
Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System
(ACASS) and the Construction Contractor Appraisal Support
System (CCASS) modules within the CPARS database.
FAC
2005-83
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-83
included the following six items, plus technical
amendments:
FAR Case 2014-022: A final
rule amended the FAR to implement the inflation
adjustment of acquisition-related dollar thresholds
using the Consumer Price Index for all urban
consumers, except for the Construction Wage Rate
Requirements statute (formerly the Davis-Bacon Act),
Service Contract Labor Standards statute, and trade
agreements thresholds.
FAR Case 2015-006: A final
rule amended the FAR to require additional actions by
contractors to assist contracting officers in ensuring
compliance with the governmentwide statutory
prohibition on the use of appropriated (or otherwise
made available) funds for contracts with any foreign
incorporated entity that is an inverted domestic
corporation or to any subsidiary of such entity.
FAR Case 2014-017: A final rule adopted, without
change, the prior interim rule amending the FAR to
address the continuing governmentwide statutory
prohibition on the use of appropriated (or otherwise
made available) funds for contracts with any foreign
incorporated entity that is an inverted domestic
corporation or any subsidiary of such entity.
FAR Case 2014-020: A final
rule amended the FAR to clarify that a determination of
exceptional circumstances is needed when a
noncompetitive contract awarded on the basis of
unusual and compelling urgency exceeds 1 year, either
at time of award or due to post-award modifications.
FAR Case 2015-010: A final
rule amends the FAR to implement a section of the Carl
Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2015 that
makes permanent the authority to issue solicitations
using special simplified procedures for acquisition of
certain commercial items.
FAR Case 2015-008: A final
rule amended the FAR to correct the terminology
relating to preparation and transmittal of synopses
and update the descriptions of federal product and
service codes related to exemptions from service
contract labor standards, to conform to the current
Federal Procurement Data System Product and Service
Codes Manual.
FAC
2005-84
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC)
2005-84 included just the following
item (plus technical amendments):
FAR Case 2015-0051: A final rule
adopted, with changes, the prior interim rule amending the FAR to
implement revisions to the Electronic Product Environmental
Assessment Tool (EPEAT®) registry.
FAC 2005-85
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC)
2005-85 was published and included the following items:
FAR Case 2015-011: An interim rule will amend the FAR to
implement sections of the Consolidated and Further
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, to prohibit the
Federal Government from entering into a contract with
any corporation having a delinquent federal tax
liability or a felony conviction under any federal
law, unless the agency has considered suspension or
debarment of the corporation and has made a
determination that this further action is not
necessary to protect the interests of the Government.
FAR Case 2015-036: Another
interim rule amended the FAR to implement a final rule issued
by the DOL's Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS),
which replaced the VETS–100 and VETS–100A Federal
Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report forms with the
new VETS–4212, Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment
Report form.
FAR Case 2015-013: A final rule adopted, without change, the
prior interim rule amending the FAR to implement Executive Order
(E.O.) 13672, entitled, "Further Amendments to Executive Order
11478, Equal Employment Opportunity in the Federal Government,
and Executive Order 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity," and a
final rule issued by the DOL.
FAR Case 2015-015: A final rule adopted, with changes, the
prior interim rule amending the FAR to implement a statutory
pilot program enhancing whistleblower protections for contractor
employees.
FAR Case 2015-009: A final rule
amended the FAR to update the government contract file retention
periods to conform with the retention periods in the National
Archives and Records Administration General Records Schedule.
FAR Case 2015-003: A final rule adopted, with changes, the
prior interim rule amending the FAR to implement the Executive
Order Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors, and a final
rule issued by the DOL.
FAC 2005-86
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC)
2005-86 was published and included the following
items:
FAR Case 2015-019: A
final rule amendedFAR 2.101 to define
"multiple-award" contract.
FAR Case 2015-034: A
final rule amended the FAR to add Montenegro and
New Zealand as new designated countries under the
World Trade Organization Government Procurement
Agreement and update the list of parties to the
Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft.
FAR Case 2016-001: A
final rule amended the FAR to incorporate revised
thresholds for application of the World Trade
Organization Government Procurement Agreement and the
Free Trade Agreements, as determined by the United
States Trade Representative.
FAR Case 2015-032: An interim rule amended the FAR
to implement regulatory changes made by the SBA that
provide for authority to award sole-source contracts
to economically disadvantaged women-owned small
business concerns and to women-owned small business
concerns eligible under the Women-Owned Small Business
Program.
Other Proposed FAR Revisions
FAR Case 2014-003: A proposed rule would amend the FAR to to
implement regulatory changes made by the SBA, which
provide for a governmentwide policy on small business
subcontracting.
FAR Case 2014-015: A proposed rule would amend the FAR to
implement sections of the Small Business Jobs Act of
2010 and regulatory changes made by the SBA, which
provide for a governmentwide policy on the
consolidation and bundling of contract requirements.
FAR Case 2014-018: A proposed rule would amend the FAR (i)
to remove the distinction between DoD and nonDoD agency areas of
operation applicable for the use of FAR clause
"Contractors Performing Private Security Functions
Outside the United States" and (ii) to provide a
definition of "full cooperation" within the clause.
FAR Case 2015-019: A proposed rule would define a
multiple-award contract as "a contract that is— (1) A
Multiple Award Schedule contract issued by GSA (e.g.,
GSA Schedule Contract) or agencies granted Multiple
Award Schedule contract authority by GSA (e.g., the
VA) as described in FAR part 38; (2) A multiple-award
task-order or delivery-order contract issued in
accordance with FAR subpart 16.5, including
Governmentwide acquisition contracts; or (3) Any other
indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract
entered into with two or more sources pursuant to the
same solicitation."
FAR Case 2014-025: A proposed rule would amend the FAR to
implement the Executive Order (E.O.) entitled "Fair Pay and Safe
Workplaces," which is designed to improve contractor
compliance with labor laws and increase efficiency and
cost savings in federal contracting and which: (i)
requires that prospective and existing contractors
disclose certain labor violations and that contracting
officers, in consultation with labor compliance
advisors, consider the disclosures, including any
mitigating circumstances, as part of their decision to
award or extend a contract; (ii) directs agencies to
include clauses in their contracts that require
similar disclosures by certain subcontractors so their
prime contractors can also consider labor violations
when determining the responsibility of subcontractors;
(iii) requires that processes be established to assist
contractors and subcontractors to come into compliance
with labor laws; (iv) requires contractors and
subcontractors to provide individuals with information
each pay period regarding how they are paid and to
provide notice to those workers whom they treat as
independent contractors; and (v) addresses arbitration
of employee claims.
FAR Case 2014-020: A proposed rule would implement 41
U.S.C. § 153 by increasing the simplified acquisition
threshold from $150,000 to $300,000 for overseas
acquisitions in support of humanitarian or
peacekeeping operations.
FAR Case 2015-018: A proposed rule would amend the
FAR to implement section 814 of the Carl Levin and
Howard P. 'Buck' McKeon National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2015, which requires the head of
the contracting activity to approve any determinations
to select more than five offerors to submit phase-two
proposals for a two-phase design-build construction
acquisition that is valued at greater than $4 million.
FAR Case 2015-025: A proposed rule would amend the
FAR to revise the Standard Forms used in contracts
involving bonds and other financial protections in
order to clarify liability limitations and expand the
options for organization types.
FAR Case 2015-022: A proposed rule would amend the
FAR to re-designate the terminology used for the
unique identification of entities receiving federal
awards by removing the proprietary DUNS® number and
substituting appropriate references to the web site
where information on the unique entity identifier will
be located. In addition, the proposed rule would
establish definitions of "unique entity identifier,"
and "electronic funds transfer (EFT) indicator."
Department of Defense FAR
Supplement (DFARS)
Final
Rules
DFARS
Case 2015-D004: A final rule amended the DFARS to update the descriptions of
Federal supply groups (now identified as product service groups) subject to
trade agreements to conform to the current Federal Procurement Data
System Product and Service Codes Manual.
DFARS
Case 2014-D001: A final rule amended the DFARS to require that scientific and
technical reports be submitted in electronic format.
DFARS Case 2014-D009: A final rule amended the DFARS to
clarify that entering into a contract award may cause a small
business to eventually exceed the applicable small business size
standard.
DFARS Case 2014-D020: A final rule amended the DFARS to
establish the level of approval required for a determination and
findings for time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts, or
portions of contracts, exceeding $1 million.
DFARS Case 2014-D024: A final rule amended the DFARS to
identify the Wide Area WorkFlow Energy Receiving Report as the
electronic equivalent of the DD Form 250, Material Inspection
and Receiving Report, for overland shipments and the DD Form
250–1, Tanker/Barge Material Inspection And Receiving Report,
for waterborne shipments.
DFARS Case 2014-D019: A final rule amended the DFARS to
update the cancellation ceiling threshold for multiyear
contracts.
DFARS Case 2014-D015: A final rule amended the DFARS to
require contracting officers to consider information in the
Statistical Reporting module of the Past Performance Information
Retrieval System when evaluating past performance of offerors
under competitive solicitations for supplies using simplified
acquisition procedures.
DFARS Case 2013-D022: DoD adopted as final, without
change, an interim rule that amended the DFARS to
implement a section of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, which addresses
the allowability of legal costs incurred by a contractor
related to whistleblower proceedings.
DFARS Case 2014-D025: A final
rule amended the DFARS to implement the inflation
adjustment of acquisition-related dollar thresholds
using the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers,
except for the Construction Wage Rate Requirements
statute (formerly the Davis-Bacon Act), Service Contract
Labor Standards statute, and trade agreements
thresholds.
DFARS Case 2015-D015: In order to conform the DFARS
with the FAR, a final rule (with minor editorial
changes): (i) moved the text of DFARS subpart 225.74
(Defense Contractors Outside the United States) to DFARS
subpart 225.3 (Contracts Performed Outside the United
States); (ii) revised the introductory texts of the
clauses at DFARS 252.225–7040 ( Contractor Personnel
Supporting U.S. Armed Forces Deployed Outside the United
States) and 252.225–7043 ( Antiterrorism/Force
Protection for Defense Contractors Outside the United
States) to reflect the changed location of the
prescriptions for use of those clauses; (iii) made a
minor editorial change to the text of each of the
clauses; and (iv) revised DFARS subparts 204.8,
212.3, and 242.3 to revise references to the DFARS text
that has been relocated from DFARS subpart 225.74 to
DFARS subpart 225.3.
DFARS Case 2015-D016: A final rule amended the DFARS
to clarify (for clauses with alternates) the appropriate
use of the basic clauses and their alternates.
DFARS Case 2015-D005: A final rule amended the DFARS to
implement sections of the Department of Defense Appropriations
Acts for Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015 that prohibit use of funds
made available under these acts for the purchase or manufacture
of a flag of the United States, unless that flag is manufactured
in the United States.
DFARS Case 2014-D023: A final rule amended the DFARS to
provide updates and clarifications regarding requirements for
contractor personnel supporting U.S. Armed Forces deployed
outside the United States.
DFARS Case 2015-D014: A final rule amended the DFARS (i) to
remove duplicative text relating to contracts or delivery orders
issued by a non-DoD Agency and (ii) to relocate remaining text
to conform to the FAR.
DFARS Case 2014-D021: A final rule amended the DFARS to
correct the prescription at DFARS 211.274–6(a)(1) for the
contract clause at DFARS 252.211–7003 ("Item Unique
Identification and Valuation").
DFARS Case 2013-D018: An interim rule amended the DFARS to to
implement a section of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013 and a section of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, both of which require
contractor reporting on network penetrations. Additionally, this
rule implements DoD policy on the purchase of cloud computing
services. Comments are due by October 26.
DFARS Case 2015-D006: A final rule adopted the prior interim
rule, without change, which amended the DFARS to implement a
section of the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015: (i) to require
offerors bidding on DoD military construction contracts to
provide opportunities for competition to American steel
producers, fabricators, and manufacturers; and (ii) to restrict
use of military construction funds in certain foreign countries,
including countries that border the Arabian Gulf.
DFARS Case 2015-D029: A final rule amended DFARS subpart
232.6 on contract debts to conform with the comparable FAR
subpart.
DFARS Case 2012-D056: A final rule amended the DFARS: (i) to
establish that the Electronic Data Access system is the primary
tool for distributing contracts and contract data; (ii) to
provide internal control procedures for data verification to
ensure contract documents in the Electronic Data Access system
are accurate representations of original documents; and (iii) to
remove outmoded language that is not consistent with electronic
document processes.
DFARS Case 2012-D050: DoD adopted as final, with
changes, the prior interim rule amending the DFARS to
implement a section of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011, as
amended by the NDAA for FY 2013, which allows DoD to
consider the impact of supply chain risk in specified
types of procurements related to national security
systems.
DFARS Case 2015-D032: A final rule amended the
DFARS to to remove Cuba from the definition of "state
sponsor of terrorism" in two DFARS clauses.
DFARS Case 2015-D033: A final rule amended the
DFARS to add Montenegro and New Zealand as newly
designated countries under the World Trade
Organization Government Procurement Agreement.
DFARS Case 2015-D031: A final rule amended the
DFARS to eliminate a requirement for military
departments and defense agencies to collect and report
relevant data on award and incentive fees paid to
contractors.
DFARS Case 2015-D007: A final rule amends the
DFARS to implement a section of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 that revises
the restrictions relating to utilization of domestic
photovoltaic devices.
DFARS Case 2016-D003: A
final rule amended the DFARS to incorporate increased thresholds
for application of the World Trade Organization Government
Procurement Agreement and the Free Trade Agreements, as
determined by the United States Trade Representative.
DFARS Case 2014-D003: A final rule amended the DFARS to
notify contractors of requirements relating to Afghanistan taxes
for contracts performed in Afghanistan.Interim Rules
DFARS Case 2015-D028: An interim rule amended the DFARS to
clarify requirements related to costs associated with
indirect offsets under FMS agreements.
DFARS Case 2013-D018: An interim rule amended the DFARS to
provide contractors with additional time to implement
security requirements specified by a National
Institute of Standards and Technology Special
Publication.
Proposed
Rules
DFARS
Case 2012-D056: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS to state the policy that the Electronic
Document Access (EDA) system is DoD’s online repository and distribution
tool for contract documents and contract data, to require internal control procedures
for contract document and data verification in EDA, and to remove
outmoded language that is not consistent with electronic document
processes.
DFARS
Case 2014-D015: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS to require contracting officers to consider
information in the Statistical Reporting module of the Past Performance
Information Retrieval System when evaluating past performance of offerors
under competitive solicitations for supplies using simplified acquisition
procedures.
DFARS
Case 2014-D023: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS to update the clause entitled
"Contractor Personnel Supporting U.S. Armed Forces Deployed Outside the United
States."
DFARS Case 2015-D007: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS
to implement a section of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2015 that revises the restrictions relating to
utilization of domestic photovoltaic devices.
DFARS Case 2015-D011: DoD proposed to amend the
DFARS to comply with the uniform procurement identification
procedures implemented in the FAR.
DFARS Case 2014-D005: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS to
further implement a requirement of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, as modified by a section
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015,
that addresses required sources of electronic parts for defense
contractors and subcontractors.
DFARS Case 2015-D017: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS:
(i) to clarify clauses and their prescriptions for
small business programs and to create a basic and
alternate clause structured in a manner to facilitate
use of automated contract writing systems,
specifically with regard to DFARS 252.219–7003 (Small
Business Subcontracting Plan (DoD Contracts)); and
(ii) to clarify DFARS 252.219–7010, Alternate A (now
titled "Notification of Competition Limited to
Eligible 8(a) Concerns—Partnership Agreement").
DFARS Case 2014-D026: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS
to require the use of the electronic contract
attachments accessible via the Product Deficiency
Reporting and Evaluation Program to record and track
warranty data and source of repair information for
serialized items.
DFARS Case 2015-D037: DoD proposed to amend the
DFARS to clarify when it is appropriate to omit DFARS
clause 252.225–7001, Buy American and Balance of
Payments Program, with regard to exceptions to the Buy
American statute and Balance of Payment Program.
Comments are due by January 19, 2016.
DFARS Case 2015-D018: DoD proposed to amend the
DFARS to clarify the contract term for contracts
awarded under the statutory authority of 10 U.S.C.
2913, which requires DoD to develop a simplified
method of contracting for shared energy savings
contract services that will accelerate the use of such
contracts.
DFARS Case 2015-D036: DoD proposed to amend the
DFARS to update the threshold for duty-free entry on
foreign supplies that are not qualifying country
supplies or eligible foreign supplies.
DFARS Case 2015-D008: DoD proposed to amend the
DFARS to implement a section of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, which amended
a section of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010, in order to extend and modify
the contract authority for advanced component
development and prototype units.
DFARS Case 2015-D023: DoD proposed to amend the
DFARS to add a definition of "long-haul
telecommunications."
DFARS Case 2015-D030: DoD proposed to amend the
DFARS to stipulate that DoD contracting officers shall
request a limited-scope audit, unless a full-scope
audit is appropriate for the circumstances, in the
interest of promoting voluntary contractor disclosure
of defective pricing identified by the contractor
after contract award.
DFARS Case 2015-D021: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS to
consolidate requirements that are applicable to DoD
contracts for private security functions performed in
designated areas outside the United States, make
changes regarding applicability, and revise applicable
quality assurance standards.
DFARS Case 2015-D009: DoD proposed to amend the DFARS to to
implement a section of the National Defense
Authorization Act for FY 2015 and a section of the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act for FY 2015,
which address various requirements for multiyear
contracts.
DoD promulgated
regulations to establish
ratemaking procedures for civil reserve air fleet contracts.
Other Agencies
Agriculture
Tthe USDA amended its regulations concerning
Guidelines for Designating Biobased Products for
Federal Procurement to incorporate statutory
changes to section 9002 of the Farm Security and Rural
Investment Act (FSRIA) that went into effect when the
Agricultural Act of 2014 (the 2014 Farm Bill) was
signed into law on February 7, 2014.
Bureau of
Industry and Security (Department of Commerce)
The Bureau
of Industry and Security (BIS) issued a final rule amending the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) to impose additional sanctions that implement U.S. policy
toward Russia, by: (i) imposing a license requirement for the export and
reexport to the Crimea region of
Ukraine (and the transfer within that region) of all items
subject to the EAR, other than food and medicine designated as
EAR99; and (ii) establishing a presumption of denial for all such exports or reexports,
except with respect to items authorized under the Department of the Treasury’s
Office of Foreign Assets Control General License No. 4, which BIS will
review on a case-by-case basis.
The BIS amended the EAR to further implement the bilateral
understanding between the United States and India announced by
President Obama and India’s Prime Minister Singh on November 8,
2010, by removing license requirements for certain items controlled for crime control and
regional stability reasons.
The
BIS amended the EAR: (i) to revise the general licensing
policy from one of denial to one of case-by-case licensing for
exports and reexports to Sudan of telecommunications equipment
and associated computers, software, and technology for civil
end use, including items useful for the development of civil
telecommunications network infrastructure; (ii) to revise
License Exception Consumer Communications Devices (CCD) (which
previously applied only to consumer communications devices to
Cuba) to authorize exports and reexports of such devices to
Sudan; (iii) to make minor technical changes to the list of
items that are eligible for both Sudan and Cuba under the
license exception; (iv) to make changes to License Exception
Temporary Imports, Exports, Reexports and Transfers
(in-country) in light of the changes to License Exception CCD;
and (v) to remove a license requirement for reexports to Sudan
of certain telecommunications software.
The BIS amended the
EAR,
inter alia, to revise six Export Control
Classification Numbers (ECCNs) to reflect changes to the
Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Annex that were
agreed to by MTCR member countries at the September and
October 2014 Plenary in Oslo, Norway.
The
BIS made extensive revisions to the CCL to implement changes
made to the Wassenaar Arrangement’s List of
Dual-Use Goods and Technologies maintained and agreed to by
governments participating in the Wassenaar Arrangement on Export
Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and
Technologies at the December 2014 WA Plenary Meeting.
The
BIS issued a final rule
amending the EAR to facilitate
internet-based communications with persons in the Crimea
region of the Ukraine by allowing exports or reexports without a
license to that region of software that is necessary to enable
the exchange of personal communications over the Internet,
provided that such software is designated EAR99, or is
classified as mass market software under Export Control
Classification Number (ECCN) 5D992.c of the EAR, and provided
further that such software is widely available to the public at
no cost to the user. This final rule is being published
simultaneously with the Department of the Treasury’s Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issuance of General License No. 9,
which authorizes the export or reexport from the United States
or by U.S. persons to the Crimea region of the Ukraine of
certain services and software incident to the exchange of
personal communications over the Internet.
The BIS
published a final rule making
a second set of corrections and clarifications to an earlier
interim final rule, which added
controls to the EAR for
spacecraft and related items that the President has determined
no longer warrant control under United States Munitions List (USML)
Category XV— spacecraft and related items.
The BIS amended the EAR by
removing the
Special Comprehensive License (SCL) authorization because
the BIS has determined that the SCL has outlived its usefulness
to the exporting public since recent changes to the EAR permit
exporters to accomplish similar results using individual
licenses and without undertaking the more onerous SCL
application.
The BIS modified the DPAS regulations by adding Spain
to the list of countries with which the DOD has
entered into
security of supply arrangements.
The BIS published
a rule to correct an error in License Exception Temporary
imports, exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) (TMP) to
make
consumer communications devices and related software
eligible for temporary export and reexport to Sudan as "tools of
trade."
The BIS published
corrections to typographical errors in a Note to ECCN
1C351.a (which includes viruses identified on the AG "List of
Human and Animal Pathogens and Toxins for Export Control") in
the final rule
first published on June 16, 2015 (80 FR 34266), which
amended the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to implement
the recommendations presented at the November 2013 Australia
Group (AG) intersessional implementation meeting and later
adopted pursuant to the AG silent approval procedure.
The BIS amended the EAR
to revise the existing authorizations for
Validated End Users Advanced Micro-Fabrication
Equipment, Inc., China (AMEC) and Applied Materials
(China), Inc. (AMC) in the People’s Republic of China
(PRC), specifically by amending Supplement No. 7 to
Part 748 of the EAR to add one item to AMEC’s list of
eligible items that may be exported, reexported or
transferred (in country) to the company’s eligible
facility in the PRC, and to add a facility and an item
to Validated End User AMC’s list of eligible
destinations and eligible items.
The BIS published an interim final rule amending the
Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to classify
XBS Epoxy Systems under Export Control Classification Number
(ECCN) 0C521 on the Commerce Control List (CCL) and to impose
on such items a license requirement for export and
reexport to all destinations, except Canada.
The BIS proposed to amend the EAR's Commodity Control List (CCL)
by creating new
"600 series" ECCNs 6A615, 6B615 and 6D615 for military
fire control, range finder, and optical items, by revising
ECCN 7A611, and by creating new ECCNs 7B611, 7C611 and
7E611 for military optical and guidance items. In
addition, the proposed rule would: (i) expand the scope of
control for certain night vision items currently subject
to the EAR; (ii) eliminate the use of some license
exceptions; (iii) create new ECCNs for certain software
and technology related to night vision items; (iv) expand
the scope of end-use restrictions on certain exports and
reexports of certain cameras, systems, or equipment; and
(v) expand the scope of military commodities described in
ECCN 0A919.
The BIS proposed to implement the agreements by the Wassenaar
Arrangement (WA) at the Plenary meeting in December 2013 by
imposing a license requirement for the export, reexport, or
transfer (in-country) of certain
cybersecurity items to all destinations (except Canada).
Although these cybersecurity capabilities were not previously
designated for export control, many of these items have been
controlled for their "information security" functionality,
including encryption and cryptanalysis. This rule thus continues
applicable Encryption Items (EI) registration and review
requirements, while setting forth proposed license review
policies and special submission requirements to address the new
cybersecurity controls, including submission of a letter of
explanation with regard to the technical capabilities of the
cybersecurity items.
The BIS proposed
amendments to the EAR:
(i) to revise the definitions of "technology," "required,"
"peculiarly responsible," "proscribed person," "published,"
results of "fundamental research," "export," "reexport,"
"release," "transfer," and "transfer (incountry)"; and (ii) to
amend the Scope part of the EAR to update and clarify the
application of controls to electronically transmitted and stored
technology and software. Concurrently, the State Department
proposed
conforming amendments to the ITAR.
The BIS
proposed to require reporting of
offsets agreements in connection with sales of items
controlled in "600 series" ECCNs on the CCL except for
certain submersible and semisubmersible cargo
transport vessels and related items that are not on
control lists of any of the multilateral export
control regimes of which the United States is a
member.
The BIS and the Department of State each published
notices of their respective plans to review the
CCL and the
Munitions List in light of recent changes to the
control of certain military vehicles, vessels of war,
submersible vessels, oceanographic equipment,
auxiliary and miscellaneous military equipment, and
related items therefor.
Department
of Commerce
As authorized by Section 111 of the "Department of
Commerce Appropriations Act, 2015," the Commerce
Department issued
an interim final rule amending its acquisition
regulation (the "CAR") by inserting a section and amending
a part to provide procedures for waiving performance
and payment bonds associated with contracts for the
repair, alteration and construction of the NOAA fleet of
research and survey vessels operated by the Office of
Marine and Aviation Operations.
The Commerce Department's National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) proposed to establish a small business
size standard of $11 million in annual gross receipts for
all businesses in the commercial fishing industry (NAICS 11411),
for Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) compliance purposes only.
The proposed $11 million standard would be used in RFA analyses
in place of the SBA's current standards of $20.5 million, $5.5
million, and $7.5 million for the finfish (NAICS 114111),
shellfish (NAICS 114112), and other marine fishing (NAICS
114119) sectors of the U.S. commercial fishing industry,
respectively. Subsequently, NFMS announced the rule would
become final effective July 1, 2016.
Department of Energy
The
DOE adopted as final, with changes, a
rule amending its Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) to add
clauses regarding applicable
export control requirements for DOE contracts.
Department of Justice
The Justice
Department finalized without change an amendment to the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives regulations
to remove those defense articles currently on the United
States Munitions Import List that ATF by delegation has
determined no longer warrant import control under the Arms
Export Control Act.
Department of
the Treasury
The
Department of the Treasury amended its acquisition
regulation (the "DTAR") to make editorial
changes in response to updates made to the FAR,
Treasury bureau organizational restructuring, and
other internal updates that have occurred since the
2013 edition.
EPA
The
EPA amended
its acquisition regulation (the EPAAR) to address minor non-substantive changes
in three clauses and two related prescriptions in the
following areas: "‘Protection of Human
Subjects," "Care of Laboratory Animals," and
"EPA Green Meetings and Conferences."
The EPA amended the EPAAR
(i) to remove source selection guidance and clauses that
were not consistent with current EPA internal operating
procedures for source selections and (ii) to delete
the "Payments—Fixed Rate Services
Contracts" clause because it was inconsistent with the
FAR.
The
EPA
proposed to amend the EPAAR
to update the "Level of Effort—Cost Reimbursement Term
Contract" clause by modifying the clause title and updating
the corresponding clause prescription.
The EPA issued
a
direct final rule to address administrative and minor
non-substantive changes in four clauses of its acquisition
regulation (the "EPAAR"): "Monthly Progress Reports," "Working
Files," "Final Reports," and "Management Consulting Services."
General
Services Administration (GSA)
GSAR
Case 2013-G503:
A final rule amended the GSA's acquisition regulation
(GSAR) to move the definitions of words and terms from the regulatory text to the
non-regulatory General Services
Acquisition Manual (GSAM).
GSA
issued
a final rule amending its Acquisition Regulation (GSAR)
to remove clause 552.211–93 ("Unique Item
Identification").
GSAR
Case 2014-G504: GSA proposed
to amend the GSAR to remove
clause 552.211–93 (Unique Item Identification)
because it: (i) is no longer needed with respect to
serially managed supply items and supply items of
$5,000 or more; (ii) is unnecessarily duplicative of
provisions in the DFARS, which can be used directly;
and (iii) only pertains to deliveries to military
activities.
GSAR
Case 2006-G506: GSA proposed
to amend the GSAR to update the text and clauses
regarding Hazardous Materials Identification and
Material Safety Data. Subsequently, GSA issued
a final rule accomplishing
the revision.
GSA
withdrew
GSAR Case 2008–G509 (Rewrite of GSAR Part 536,
Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts),
originally published on December 2, 2008, because an agency review of the current
implementation plan for this GSAR case was sufficient
to address the variety of issues included in the GSAR
Part 536 rewrite.
GSA
proposed to amend the Federal Property Management
Regulations (FPMR) and the Federal Management
Regulation (FMR) by: (i) migrating
regulations regarding the supply and procurement of
government personal property management from the FPMR
to the FMR; and (ii) eliminating material that is not
regulatory in nature, overly prescriptive, addressed
in other policy, or outdated.
GSAR
Case 2013-G504: GSA proposed
to amend the GSAR to include clauses that would
require vendors to report transactional data from
orders and prices paid by ordering activities for
orders placed against both FSS contract vehicles and
GSA’s non-FSS contract vehicles: Governmentwide
Acquisition Contracts (GWACs) and Governmentwide IDIQ
contracts.
GSAR Case 2007-G500: GSA proposed to amend the
GSAR: (i) to revise requirements for special
contracting methods, (ii) to incorporate various
updates eliminating out of date references, and (iii)
to reorganize the text to align with the FAR.
GSAR Case 2015-G508:
GSA proposed to amend the GSAR's
coverage on Construction and Architect-Engineer Contracts,
including provisions and clauses for solicitations and resultant
contracts, to remove
unnecessary regulations.
HHS
HHS
proposed a lengthy set of revisions
to its FAR Supplement (the HHSAR): to update its
provisions to current FAR requirements; to remove information
from the HHSAR that consists of material that is internal
administrative and procedural in nature; to add or revise
definitions; to correct certain terminology; and to delete
outdated material and material duplicative of the FAR.
HUD
HUD proposed to amend its acquisition
regulation (the HUDAR) to implement miscellaneous changes
necessary to
update the HUDAR. These changes include a correction to the
designation of Source Selection Authorities, limited delegation
of Head of Contracting Activity authorities, incorporation of
the HUDAR Matrix, addition of new clauses, certain
administrative corrections, and incorporation of
alternates to various clauses to allow for electronic
invoicing. Labor
OFCCP issued
regulations to be effective January 11, 2016,
implementing
E.O. 13665, which prohibits retaliation for the
disclosure of compensation information.
OFCCP
proposed regulations that would set forth requirements that
covered federal government contractors and subcontractors and federally
assisted construction contractors and subcontractors must meet in fulfilling
their obligations under Executive Order 11246, as amended, to ensure
nondiscrimination in employment on
the basis of sex and to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are
employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without
regard to their sex. This proposal would substantially revise the existing Sex
Discrimination Guidelines, which have not been substantively updated since
1970, and replace them with regulations that align with current law and legal
principles and address their application to current workplace practices and
issues.
NASA
A
final rule amended the NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(NFS) with numerous revisions designed to eliminate
unnecessary regulation, clarify language, and simplify
processes.
NASA amended the NFS to
remove requirements related to the discontinued Space
Flight Mission Critical Systems Personnel Reliability
Program and to revise requirements related to
contractor
drug and alcohol testing.
A final rule revised the NFS to delete clause 1852.242–72 ("Observance of
Legal Holidays") and its alternates and replaced them with a new
clause that prescribes conditions and procedures pertaining to
the
closure of NASA facilities.
NASA issued an interim rule revising the
capitalization
threshold in the NFS' "Use of Government
Property for Commercial Work" clause (section
1845.301–71) from $100,000 to $500,000. Subsequently, NASA
made the interim rule
final. Also,
effective December 28, a final rule amended the NFS to revise a
clause related to
safety and health measures and mishaps reporting in order to
reduce the burden on contractors and to provide guidance on (i)
specific safety and health measures that the contractor must
take when working on a federal facility and (ii) the remedies
available to the Government for the contractor's failure to
maintain an effective safety and health program.
NASA proposed to amend the NFS
to revise the current clause at 1852.223–70 ("Safety and
Health Measures and Mishaps Reporting") by narrowing
its application, in order to decrease the reporting
burden on contractors while reinforcing the measures
contractors at NASA facilities must take to protect
the safety of their workers, NASA employees, the
public, and high value assets.
Office
of Special Counsel
The
U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) proposed to revise
its regulations to expand who may file a whistleblower
disclosure with OSC concerning wrongdoing within the
federal government to include employees of federal contractors,
subcontractors, and grantees if they work at or on behalf
of a U.S. government component for which OSC has jurisdiction to accept
disclosures.
Postal
Service
The PSBCA
revised its rules of practice to implement an
electronic filing system. Small
Business Administration (SBA)
The SBA
amended
its small business size regulations: (i) to implement
statutory provisions establishing limitations of
liability from fraud penalties for individuals or
firms that misrepresent business concerns as being
small for purposes of federal procurement
opportunities if they acted in good faith reliance
upon small business status advisory opinions received
from Small Business Development Centers or Procurement
Technical Assistance Centers; (ii) to establish the
criteria small business status advisory opinions must
meet in order to be deemed adequate and specify the
review process for such opinions; and (iii) to update
the circumstances under which the SBA may initiate a
formal size determination.
SBA
proposed to
amend its regulations: (i) to establish a
government-wide mentor-protégé program for all small
business concerns, consistent with SBA’s mentor-protégé
program for Participants in SBA’s 8(a) Business
Development (BD) program; (ii) to adopt minor changes
to the mentor-protégé provisions for the 8(a)
Business Development program in order to make the
mentor-protégé rules for each of the programs as
consistent as possible; (iii) to amend the current
joint venture provisions to clarify the conditions for
creating and operating joint venture partnerships,
including the effect of such partnerships on any
mentor-protégé relationships; and (iv) to make
several additional changes to current size, 8(a)
Office of Hearings and Appeals and HUBZone
regulations, concerning among other things, ownership
and control, changes in primary industry, standards of
review and interested party status for some appeals.
The SBA proposed to amend its regulations: (i) to
implement section 825 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, which grants
contracting officers the authority to award
sole source contracts to Women Owned Small Businesses
(WOSBs) and Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small
Businesses (EDWOSBs); and (ii) to amend its definitions of
underrepresentation and substantial underrepresentation.
The SBA proposed to amend its
regulations to implement Section 1614 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 in order to permit an
other than small prime contractor that has an individual
subcontracting plan for a contract to receive credit towards its
small business subcontracting goals for subcontract awards
made to small business concerns at any tier.
SBA intends to draft regulations to implement the statutory changes in
section 825 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2015, which removes the statutory authority allowing
Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSBs) and Economically
Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Businesses (EDWOSBs)
to self-certify.
State Department
The
State Department made a host of technical
amendments to its acquisition regulation (DOSAR)
to update procedures and terminology and align
the DOSAR with changes to the FAR.
The State Department
revised the ITAR to rescind the previous policy of denying the
export of defense articles and defense services to
Fiji.
The State Department temporarily revised
Category XI of the Munitions List to clarify that
the scope of control in existence prior to December
30, 2014 for paragraph (b) and directly related
software in paragraph (d) remains the same. This
clarification is achieved by reinserting the words
"analyze and produce information from" and by adding
software to the description of items controlled. A
permanent fix for the issue is being developed.
The State Department proposed to amend the ITAR to revise
Category XII (fire control, range finder, optical and
guidance and control equipment) of the U.S. Munitions List
(USML) to describe more precisely the articles warranting
control there. In tandem with these changes, the Commerce
Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
proposed to amend the EAR's Commodity Control List (CCL)
by creating new
"600 series" ECCNs 6A615, 6B615 and 6D615 for military
fire control, range finder, and optical items, by revising
ECCN 7A611, and by creating new ECCNs 7B611, 7C611 and
7E611 for military optical and guidance items. In
addition, the proposed rule would: (i) expand the scope of
control for certain night vision items currently subject
to the EAR; (ii) eliminate the use of some license
exceptions; (iii) create new ECCNs for certain software
and technology related to night vision items; (iv) expand
the scope of end-use restrictions on certain exports and
reexports of certain cameras, systems, or equipment; and
(v) expand the scope of military commodities described in
ECCN 0A919.
The State Department
proposed to amend the ITAR to
clarify the requirements for the
licensing and registration of U.S. persons providing defense
services while in the employ of foreign persons.
The State
Department proposed to amend the ITAR: (i)
to clarify regulations pertaining to the export of items
subject to the EAR; (ii) to revise the licensing exemption for
exports made to or on behalf of an agency of the U.S.
Government; and (iii) to revise the destination control
statement in ITAR § 123.9 to harmonize the language with the
EAR. In tandem with this proposed rule, the BIS proposed to
revise the
destination control statement in the EAR to harmonize the
statement required for the export of items subject to the EAR
with the destination control statement in the ITAR.
The State Department
proposed to amend the ITAR to revise Categories XIV
(toxicological agents, including chemical agents, biological
agents, and associated equipment) and XVIII (directed energy
weapons) of the U.S. Munitions List (USML) to describe more
precisely the articles warranting control there. Concurrently,
the BIS proposed that the
items that no longer warrant control under these categories of
the USML would be controlled under the
CCL. The affected Category XIV
articles consist primarily of dissemination, detection and
protection equipment and related articles and would be
controlled under new ECCNs 1A607, 1B607, 1C607, 1D607, and 1E607.
The affected Category XVIII articles consist primarily
of tooling, production equipment, test and evaluation
equipment, test models and related articles and would
be controlled under new ECCNs 6B619, 6D619 and 6E619.
The BIS and the State Department each
published notices of their respective plans to review
the
CCL and the
Munitions List in light of recent changes to the
control of certain military vehicles, vessels of war,
submersible vessels, oceanographic equipment,
auxiliary and miscellaneous military equipment, and
related items therefor.
Veterans
Affairs
The VA
adopted
as final, and without changes, the prior interim rule: (i)
amending its adjudication procedures for SDVOSB and VOSB
status protests to provide that (a) VA’s Director, Center
for Verification and Evaluation (CVE), shall initially decide
SDVOSB and VOSB status protests, and (b) protested businesses,
if they are denied status, may appeal to VA’s Executive
Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business
Utilization (OSDBU); and (ii) revising the meaning of the
title "CVE" from the "Center for Veterans
Enterprise" to the "Center for Verification and
Evaluation," in order to more appropriately describe the
function of this office.
The VA proposed
extensive revisions to its regulations governing the VOSB
Verification Program in order to: (i) clarify the
eligibility requirements for businesses to obtain
"verified" status; (ii) add and revise definitions,
including the definition of "control"; (iii) better
explain the examination procedure and review
processes; (iv) remove or revise references to
community property restrictions, "unconditional"
ownership, day-to-day requirements, and full-time
requirements; and (v) add an exception for majority,
supermajority, unanimous, or other voting provisions
for extraordinary business decisions.
|
|
This website links to resources on the web
concerning government contracting. It is not intended to provide
legal advice. Moreover, I do not vouch for the completeness,
currency, or accuracy of the sites to which it links. If you
have comments, suggestions for new links, or corrections,
please email me.
|